this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
21 points (95.7% liked)

[Closed] Moved to !fedigrow@lemmy.zip

1584 readers
1 users here now

This community has moved to !fedigrow@lemmy.zip

Original sidebar infoTo discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

Megathreads:

Rules:

  1. Be respectful
  2. No bigotry

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If they are similar, why not consolidate?

[–] small44@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because each instance and community had it's own rules. With custom feeds user can choose with communities he want to consolidate and separate them again if he want

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] small44@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

!movies@lemmy.world allows shitposts/memes. It's a big deal to some people like me

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] small44@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok my mistake but that is just one example. They may exists some two similar community with different rules. I constantly read people opinions on the fediverse selling point was about it being censorship resistant because you can switch to another instance

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

similar community with different rules.

In those cases, the communities should not consolidate, and would not "follow each other" under Proposal 3.

[–] small44@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So the solution may only reduce the duplications but not fix it completely. A lot of communities are already dead with no active admins

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Better to not have to start over 100% if the main community is on a server that randomly disappears forever or turns sour and gets defederated.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t that go against decentralization?

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Decentralization is being able to access the same content from different instances.

Duplicating communities is the opposite: now people can't see the same content, they have to follow all the similar communities

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they have to follow all the similar communities

See, this compulsion needs to be killed off. Because no, they absolutely do not have to.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If a user wants to see all the activity on a given topic, they very much do have to.