this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
20 points (95.5% liked)

Fedigrow

1190 readers
283 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

Rules

  1. Be respectful
  2. No bigotry

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Custom feeds grouping similar communities

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That was addressed in the article under Proposal 2:

it's a feature not many people made use of, and it sounds like a pain to have to constantly create and manage new multi-communities to group together duplicate communities. This shouldn't be a task that users have to manually do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It shouldn't be difficult to group some community automatically then users can edit it if they want

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Personally I think proposal 2 and 3 should happen concurrently. Using the example in the post I would setup a custom feed (that can hopefully consolidate cross posts) for breakfast. I would put [email protected] which subscribes to [email protected] I can also add [email protected] and [email protected]. so when someone posts about the best homemade peanut butter syrup recipe that is cross posted to my pancake and waffle communities, I don't get 4 posts about it, I can see it once and choose where to reply (pancakes obviously, I'm a waffle purist).

Community interlinking/subscription fixes a slightly different problem than custom feeds IMO. It's a really good idea, but I would personally still want custom feeds (with the ability to handle crossposts in a customizable way).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If they are similar, why not consolidate?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t that go against decentralization?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Decentralization is being able to access the same content from different instances.

Duplicating communities is the opposite: now people can't see the same content, they have to follow all the similar communities

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they have to follow all the similar communities

See, this compulsion needs to be killed off. Because no, they absolutely do not have to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If a user wants to see all the activity on a given topic, they very much do have to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because each instance and community had it's own rules. With custom feeds user can choose with communities he want to consolidate and separate them again if he want

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

[email protected] allows shitposts/memes. It's a big deal to some people like me

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok my mistake but that is just one example. They may exists some two similar community with different rules. I constantly read people opinions on the fediverse selling point was about it being censorship resistant because you can switch to another instance

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

similar community with different rules.

In those cases, the communities should not consolidate, and would not "follow each other" under Proposal 3.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

So the solution may only reduce the duplications but not fix it completely. A lot of communities are already dead with no active admins

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Better to not have to start over 100% if the main community is on a server that randomly disappears forever or turns sour and gets defederated.