this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
945 points (99.8% liked)

News

37894 readers
1453 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 168 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This shit is straight up evil, will the company be held accountable for their crimes? This is what our justice system is for. Based on what we know so far, more crimes would be bound to come out in an investigation.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even if they’re held to account there just gonna Texas two step and declare bankruptcy.

And then spin up another subsidiary and start over,

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wish it wasn't the case. "Corporations are people too should go both ways... Death penalty if you do evil enough crimes.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will believe that, "corporations are people," the moment that Texas executes one.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

All (East) Texas ever does is give them payouts for asinine and obvious patents.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

This should absolutely happen. And it’s not just because corporations bad. It’s because it would fix the process of risk analysis and decision making.

It’s one thing to have an accident or run into unintended consequences of business decisions. Maybe some of those could carry the death penalty in extreme cases of negligence, but probably not the vast majority.

But if the company spent decades lying and conspiring in order to make some money while destroying lives and killing people left and right? The government should seize all shares of the company (yes even the ones in our 401ks) overnight and detain the officers and directors of the company for the criminal investigation.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 18 points 1 year ago

Individuals who committed these crimes on behalf of the company should be charged with fraud a the very least.

[–] Lon3star@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The justice system that just allowed a convicted criminal to run out the clock on a heinous crime and become president

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a heinous crime

Friend, you’re going to have to be WAY more specific than that.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Luigi held them accountable, let’s hope for more

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did he though? The company is still doing all this shit and making tons of money.

Sure, they publicly mourned him and condemned the killing, but they also went right back to business, making cash hand over fist with no pause or real consideration to what they are doing to their customers at all.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well if the public keeps hearing that they overcharged patients 1000% and that he was CEO during 51,000 denials for life saving health care it may get the jury to not prosecute. Which in turn would mean change your practices or it may be open season on Healthcare executives.

I imagine overhauling their practices and publicly trying to show they are changing them may ensure he gets charged and then they would have to try to float back to ripping people off quietly.

Odds he walks are slim, odds he walks and they don't change their practices which leads to more executives deaths is higher from the outrage I've seen

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If at first you don't succeed. Try try again.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s not the justice system, it’s the legal system

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we start using the justice system instead, then?

[–] Machinist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That system seems to be malfunctioning severely. Bypassing that system has physical risks to the user and should not be attempted lightly.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That system seems to be malfunctioning severely.

Pressing all buttons I can reach to doubt this take.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

That's how leftists traditionally point out that the rule of law is often immoral and unfair. An important distinction and longstanding ideological point of disagreement.

But when the law says one thing but the judges say another out of fear of political consequences, it's not even legal system either. Which is what happened with Trump's cases and is going to keep happening increasingly often especially with a strongly partisan SC.

Americans need to understand that the rule of law is dead or dying and won't save them. It does not matter anymore what the law says, the fascists and oligarchs control all three branches of federal government and are open about the fact that they'll drop all pretense of political neutrality or independence. The judicial branch won't stop the executive from violating your rights and vice-versa. The only counterpowers are the states and the people, to the extent that they give a shit (election says about 3/4 of Americans do not give a shit or actively support fascism). It's not a legal system anymore. It does not matter that the law is on your side when your enemy makes regular "campaign contributions" to the rulers.

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From where I'm sitting, the justice system seems to be more interested in investigating poor individuals than rich companies. I can't think of many modern examples of rich companies (or even people) being held accountable for something that didn't involve stealing from other rich people.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

There's examples but they aren't proportional. Oh, a company with 3 billion in revenue poisoned the water supply for a whole county? Let's fine them $10 million.

That definitely teaches them a lesson about consequences, except the lesson is that they don't matter.

[–] Vertelleus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

US Government: Best I can do is a slap on the wrist to the tune of about 0.0000001% of their yearly profits and a hardy, "don't do that."

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The shareholders are quite pleased with their returns