this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
448 points (97.5% liked)

News

35724 readers
2582 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump plans to discuss potentially ending childhood vaccination programs with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his nominee for Health and Human Services.

Trump expressed openness to revisiting vaccine policies, citing concerns about autism rates, despite scientific consensus debunking links between vaccines and autism.

Critics warn reducing vaccinations could lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases like measles.

Kennedy, known for questioning vaccine safety, would oversee the CDC if confirmed.

Public health experts remain concerned about the implications.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 175 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Anybody with half a brain can see the collapse of the U.S. coming from a mile away based on what's happening right now. Our institutions are at an all-time low in trust, all bcz of this orange dickhead, and Russian/Chinese disinformation campaigns.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (4 children)

all bcz of this orange dickhead, and Russian/Chinese disinformation campaigns.

I mean yeah. But also because Americans are profoundly stupid. No excuses. As a whole, we're stupid as fuck.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Our schools have been under attack by the usual shitheads ever since we won to get them integrated.

Smart comfortable people don't obey. Uneducated, poor people with two jobs and three kids don't have any energy left over to crack a book and be disruptive.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

So you're saying we should blame the rich and oligarchs. Agreed.

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Politicians do not benefit from an educated populace.

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Decades of republicans cutting education and lying will do that.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You mean that?

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We elected TFG... twice. Humanity is doomed

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What’s this “we?” I take zero responsibility for the election of that idiot. I tried as hard as I could to get everyone I know to not vote for him.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh. It's "we" whether you like it or not, unfortunately.

Do we really differentiate between the good and bad Germans in Nazi Germany? Not really. History paints with broad strokes. In the future we're all going to look like the bad guys, whether we fought back or not. It's a shameful time to be an American.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? There are quite a few Germans who rebelled against against the Nazis and are recognized for it.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And people think that most Germans rebelled? You are missing the point.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nobody said "most Germans". They said "all", which is not only untrue, it's a malignment of those who did resist and serves to discourage future resistance, which is entirely unhelpful. If that's truely where the US is headed, the last thing people need to hear is, "Everyone will think you're a piece of shit no matter what you do."

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thinking in absolutes is a childish thing to begin with, it has nothing to do with maligning the people who resisted.

Of course there will be varying accounts for those involved, but as a whole, Americans shoulder the responsibility of their country just the same as Germans shouldered theirs. I wouldnt hold it against someone who felt involved or responsible, and deciding at some point to rebel.

But that doesnt mean they still weren't part of something awful for some period of time. Just like Americans are part of something awful right now, and for quite a long time.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not the one "thinking in absolutes". The user you're defending literally said it doesn't matter what American's do - everyone will be considered the same.

In the future we’re all going to look like the bad guys, whether we fought back or not.

Actual quote from them. But I'm the one you're calling a child. Buzz off.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I said anyone talking in absolutes is a child. I get that you didnt do that, and so wasnt calling you a child.

The point I'm making is, they are right that all Americans share a part in what the country does to people around the world, even if they oppose it. Its not a bad thing to be against something you are or were apart of though.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

"Absolutism is childish"

Defends and supports absolutism

Ok, bud.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

"The Former Guy", refers to Trump.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

And I swear you guys are going to take us down with you (as a Canadian). The Trump "jokes" about annexing Canada are really starting to get to me.

So much for being good trading partners and friendly neighbours I guess

Edit: this isn't really directed at you in particular, it's just that as Canadians we didn't even get a say in this but somehow you voted overwhelmingly for him again and now he's threatening to invade us before he even takes office. I'm fucking tired man (and a little drunk)

[–] Adm_Drummer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Tell me about it. I can feel the rumblings of something awful coming for Canada. All because if this bullshit down south. Our rights are being threatened because of reactionary politics. Half the people I work with can't seperate Canadian politics from American. They think it's all the same.

Drives me up the wall.

[–] eramseth@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We did not vote overwhelmingly for him. He barely won.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair, but he did win the popular vote which I really wasn't expecting. I realise very little US Lemmy users are happy about it either, but the Canada rhetoric Trump is spouting is still freaking me out.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

he did win the popular vote

Frankly I also don't believe that for half a second either. We had over a full year's worth of "I am going to cheat in this election." 'He's going to cheat and we're gonna help him!' "Mike Johnson and I, we have a nice secret surprise, it's a secret, can't tell you anything, but it's going to guarantee I win the election." 'Hi, my name is Mike Johnson and I intend to help Trump cheat the election.' "If Kamala wins the election is rigged no matter what happens. We've rigged it in our favor so obviously if we lose the Democrats have rigged the election."

And then, lo and behold, he wins, by an ass-hair percentage of a degree in exactly the states he needed to in order to take the presidency.

Unless I'm the one counting those ballots by hand I don't believe a fucking word of it. All trust in all branches of government has evaporated. But what can we do now.

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

i swear if he really tries to annex us i would be defending our borders. But do you know what bothers me more? the Canadians who would defect and help the US annex us.

[–] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree with everything you said except that all the blame lies with Trump and Russian/Chinese disinfo campaigns. This has been going on since ~~the Tea Party~~ ~~George W Bush/Cheney~~ ~~Newt Gingrich~~ ~~Reagan~~ probably before anybody reading this was born