this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
282 points (99.0% liked)

Animals

544 readers
44 users here now

Anything and everything about non-human animals.

Rules:

  1. Posts should be relevant to non-human animals, including articles (news or just interesting facts), pictures (OC only but the animals need not be your pets), or text posts.
  2. Keep things civil. Don't insult other users or their pets. Do not post content that promotes animal abuse (this does not include content, like news, that portrays abuse in a negative light).
  3. Follow site-wide rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Theoretically, this process can go on indefinitely, effectively rendering the jellyfish biologically immortal,[3][6] although in practice individuals can still die. In nature, most Turritopsis dohrnii are likely to succumb to predation or disease in the medusa stage without reverting to the polyp form.[7] --WP

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turritopsis_dohrnii

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wouldn’t this be bad for the species in many ways?, can’t understand the evolutionary pressure to allow this

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the whole point of classic sex is that it allows for a LOAD more exchange of genetic material than you have with the usual creeping, genetic mutations, compared to lifeforms that self-reproduce.

So there's not an 'evolutionary pressure' here as I understand it, but more like a niche being exploited. We must remember that ~99% of lifeforms on Earth are extinct, and that there are no guarantees of any kind upon sustainable survivability.

For example, with ocean acidification growing pH changes, a range of species (like this one) might suddenly quickly vamoose as a species, with no chance to adapt. That's the 'choice' they made... to live inside a certain niche of sustainability.

Until the lights go out for them... which countless species have experienced before.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Just trying to illustrate the difference between the two scenarios.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm guessing they have better adaptability when young.