this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
935 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

21113 readers
510 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gjoel@programming.dev 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isn't that usually how infestations work though?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Humans infest shark habitats. You don't see sharks coming into your gated community, do you?

Would be a rad way to thin out the herd of xenophobic rich people, though 🤔

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, sharks rarely infest gated communities. The point was that infestations usually consist of animals that live in the place they are undesired.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No, the point is that indigenous populations are not infesting their own natural habitats.

For example, "Native Americans" did not "infest" the United States. White people did.

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

So the right phrasing would be "no, it's their natural habitat", not "no, they live there", since, and this was my point if you go back, if an animal infests something it usually lives there, making the point in the post redundant.

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a different point though. If you have a termite infestation, you might say that they're invasive to the house and it's not their natural element. However you might also say that they live there, which is equally true.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you have a termite infestation, you might say that they're invasive to the house and it's not their natural element. However you might also say that they live there, which is equally true.

But the post is about sharks in the ocean. It is their natural habitat, they live there, but because they're sometimes inconvenient to humans, humans sometimes use the phrase "shark-infested waters", which can be damaging because it frames disrupting the ecosystem as some kind of defensive act.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And my point was it's the humans that don't belong and cause damage and yet there have been humans infesting the oceans since time immemorial and it's only getting worse.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Right, I agree with you. I was responding to gjoel's comments.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Yes the white folks came and made a mess of the place. Which, if sharks chose to move into your house, they would also do. Probably leave the taps running all over the place too

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Damn snobbish animals living in gated communities.

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And sharks regularly infest zoos?

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't you if you were a shark? It's a whole smörgåsbord

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Valid point. Although that's without their consent, whereas most humans infesting the ocean are choosing to remain there, USS Abraham Lincoln sailors notwithstanding.

[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Aren't infestations about something that wasn't there before and doesn't actually belong there?

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No, it is about their presence being wanted or not. I don't want to go to a swamp because is infested with mosquitoes for example, mosquitoes were always there.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/infestation
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/infest

[–] credo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I saw both links pop up as well. I opted to go with the first, standard, book— webster’s instead of cherry picking.

The problem is, both meanings are correct. However, the “troublesome” definition is primary.. and look at the example given:

1 to spread or swarm in or over in a troublesome manner

shark-infested waters

2 to live in or on as a parasite

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We are aware of the dictionary definition. OP was precisely about arguing that that definition is a based on a fallacy.

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BossDj@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Present where they are unwanted, but often used to describe their natural habitat.

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I see. The word infested has nothing to do with being their natural habitats or not, it means that there's plenty of an animal we don't want for whatever reason, otherwise we would say that it is rich in those animals.

Edit: Oh, second I see. The fallacy is that they are using a wrong definition that is creeping into a common use of the word not yet in the dictionary.

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

But live there though.