this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
267 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

12349 readers
407 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And the further north they got the more fucked they’d be

Doesn't like 90% of Canada's population live within 100 km of the border? Not much reason to even go that far north unfortunately

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

I imagine people would start moving away from the border if an actual fighting war broke out

[–] Medic8eme@piefed.ca 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No need to take the minerals, oil and water that are abundant in those northern places?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ehhh. Most of the extraction happens in the south too, because you need workers (edit: and reasonably low shipping costs). Like, Fort Mac is a little further north, but it's still below 60N, in Alberta.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mining and O&G put together are like 5% of Canada's GDP. All the valuable real estate and I suspect much of the industries other than mining and logging are concentrated in the major cities. You'd get like 90% of the benefits from controlling 10% of the country. Not that I'd expect Trump to realize this. Luckily he seems to be as dumb as he is evil.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But it's a good portion of our exports. Hairdressers aren't super relevant for an occupying force.

Although, resource extraction wouldn't be the point of this war. There's lots of much softer, easier to propagandise about targets out there, if they just wanted an encore of colonialism.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hairdressers aren't super relevant for an occupying force.

That's fair. But I'm pretty sure most of the manufacturing is still near where the population is since workers are needed. And if they decide to go full settler mode, all the urban areas will be free to occupy if Canadians are out in the forests defending the homeland.

But tbf, it is Trump we're talking about. He would probably want the oil more than anything, even if there's so much else that would be much easier to take.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The plan is to follow the Taliban's example, it sounds like, so there'd be both rural and urban activity reinforcing each other, and the point would be to make properly occupying all cities at once fairly impossible.

Trump's main motive seems to improvement of the US's size and border shape on a map. Probably, Like in Afghanistan, resources are besides the point. Although he's not going to say no if he can manage it.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

That means there's all the more wilderness area to retreat and disappear into.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Regardless that at least 70% of Americans would join the Canadians

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

Or at least passively support us, which works.