this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
421 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

33823 readers
1905 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 61 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Am I crazy that those sound reasonable IT manager level things? If company size is 100-200 endpoints, the IT manager should understand all of these, if he/she doesn't, I would not want to work at that IT team

[–] xylol@leminal.space 30 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It manager level for entry level pay

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I've worked at places with <50 people where the 2 IT people had "manager" titles, but they were just "the IT people" in practice - one handled user stuff, the other was focused on the client-facing infrastructure.

Our lone HR person was also the "HR manager", we had a single "accounting manager", and a couple more like that. Some departments ended up expanding and the "managers" did end up with direct reports, but that's kinda just how small businesses work, this posting sounds a lot like that.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

110k usd is entry level pay? I hate america so much its unreal.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Manager" in this context generally doesn't mean someone who has people reporting to them, it means someone who manages the IT. It can absolutely be an early-career role. See also: equipment manager, facilities manager etc.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There’s not enough hours in day to do all those tasks that this will entail. You’ll constantly be dragged between different domains nd have no time to focus on anything

Source: I’ve done this job before. Company wasn’t even big either. Just 30 people or so

[–] arin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly for 30 people it's understandable, hiring properly would be like 10% of the company already lol

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

When you consider that IT is used by everyone and often the entire company is built on IT and communication i would hire properly

[–] arin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Depends if the company is growing or just a small company

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're not crazy, it's just that posts like this are generally tribal. Nobody here actually knows what the day-to-day of that job is, they just want a pretext to vent about their own experiences of being asked to do work that they didn't want to do.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

also potentially unpopular opinion: I've encountered about as many engineers over the years that were under-skilled for their positions, than ones who were competent. Whenever I see posters whine about how unreasonable the requirements for a job posting is, I always instinctively read it in one of the former's voices...