this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
1144 points (98.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

17496 readers
397 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 82 points 5 days ago (7 children)

This isn't a capitalism problem. It's an authoritarianism problem. The only thing about this that relates to capitalism is that it's a private company setting up the cameras instead of the state doing it.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 43 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That's a gross over simplification that ignores the influence of the insurance industry shifting the baseline of public surveillance and crony capitalism that infects our municipalities.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

Yes, that's how it's implemented under capitalism.

States further into their authoritarianism don't need to bother with middle men and cutouts and shit.

They just put up the cameras.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago

Capitalists have been trying to build the panopticon since the first factories.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 35 points 5 days ago

Capitalism is pretty inherently authoritarian. The boss calls the shots.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago

"Decentralize the mass surveillance!" cries the anarcho-libertarian. "Big Government is monopolizing all the cameras! We should let the market decide who gets spied on!"

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is absolutely a capitalism problem. It's what happens when you let corporations do whatever without consequences as long as they can afford the bribes and in turn get contacts on taxpayer money.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

True, but I could also see an authoritarian "communist" government doing all the same surveillance bullshit.

So, while it's a capitalism problem this time, I don't think it's a capitalism-exclusive problem. It really is, at its root, an authoritarianism problem. This time, you've got capitalist authoritarianism, but next time maybe a different flavor.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

China already has this sort of system completely built out.

Yeah, it's creepy. There's almost no secure place in the world at this point.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'll tell you more, the UK is one of the leading countries in cameras per capita, either installed or accessible by the authorities (not sure about exact details). They built government surveillance without any communism in sight.

(Leaving alone that China's state capitalism is the opposite of communism.)

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

In 2023, China had over 700 million cameras tracking the population.

That's one camera for every two citizens.

But yes the UK is also building a surveillance state.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But is the technology developed by the state or are they contracting it out to a private company?

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How does that matter?

Both are fucking horrible.

But also, China does both. In 2023 they had over 700 million cameras tracking people.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

State: communist.
Private: capitalist.
End result: authoritarianism.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You can't get rid of authoritarianism the same way you can't get rid of stupid. Some portion of the population will always be the bottom of the bell curve.

What you can do, however, is redirect it into something positive. For example, Japanese social structures are pretty fuckin' authoritarian. Most people wouldn't even dream of littering.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 5 days ago

You can’t get rid of authoritarianism the same way you can’t get rid of stupid.

True, but you can get rid of hierarchical authority itself, leaving the authoritarians nothing to work with. Ask your local anarchist how.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

That's how they get away with it too. Worst constitutional loophole ever.

[–] liuther9@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Capitalism is about gaining all power (capital). Its end goal is complete surveillance. 2+2 = 4

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Yes, 2+2=4, but so does 1+3, 0+4, 1.5+2.5, etc.

The problem of mass surveillance is coming from people who want control. The fact that they are capitalist this time is coincidental. It could just as easily be a theocratic government or an absolute monarchy that wants the level of control that mass surveillance can enable.