this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
1038 points (98.6% liked)

People Twitter

10254 readers
502 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 152 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That’s factually false.

He can save a lot of humans every day by doing something humanitarian and does not.

The only logical inference is that his motivation is not saving humans but killing apes.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 71 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, lol.

Would you kill all apes to save one human? "Sure!"

Would you donate $500 to save one human? "Fuck no!"

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Logical conclusion: "rather kill all apes than donate 500$". Anyone with this mindset is a trash human being.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Killing all humans probably does more good overall than saving one.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Besides, if he DID kill all apes, the damage to complex ecosystems across the world that rely on interdependent species including apes would DEFINITELY lead to the deaths of more than one human.

Probably at least two.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Likely! Possibly 5!

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Technically if he killed all apes killing all humans would be part of that process.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's technically still within the "at least two" range 😉

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The best kind of correct is where somebody sees the error of their ways and becomes a better person and its because you were goddamn right.

'Technically correct' is , at best, the 3rd best kind of correct.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no, the best kind of correct is when you find four stamps.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Hermes Correct, lol

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

"I hate every ape I see, from Chimpan-A to chimpanzee..." 🎶

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Which fact? The post is just two dickheads mouthing off at each other...