this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
43 points (85.2% liked)

Canada

12126 readers
467 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 22 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

You're 100% correct. I don't think I would frame it as "Trump won the argument on NATO spending" so much as "Trump highlighted a weakness in NATO by turning the US into a potentially hostile force"

The former implies that Trump had the goal to increase NATO spending from member nations, which is not at all true. Instead it was more that Trump will do almost anything he is asked if the order comes from someone he respects. Be that Putin, Bibi, or some GOP mastermind.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

I don't think I would frame it as "Trump won the argument

No, but you're also not making statements that you know a raging narcissist like Trump will be hearing.

Stroking his ego costs little, and can prevent (or reduce) future attacks.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

It is true. That was a goal. Maybe not the one he was aiming for with his actions.