this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
592 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

12075 readers
2728 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 72 points 1 day ago (9 children)

"No, it was about states' rights!"

"States' rights to do what?"

"... >:[ "

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

B̵̃ͅ ̷̰̆U̵͇̾ ̷̪͝Ṟ̶͛ ̴̙͋Ṇ̷̌

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Article I Section 9(4) of the Confederate constitution:

No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed.

Yeah, they specifically restricted state's rights.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

States' rights to do what, motherducker!

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It was explicitly NOT about states' rights. The Confederacy hated states' rights. They were the ones pissed they couldn't enforce their shitty laws in the North. They prevented any of their member states from ever outlawing slavery.

That line isn't just a cutesy way of hiding the ugly part behind the technical truth, it's a flat out lie.

You're absolutely right, and I had no intention to mean otherwise with my memery. Apologies for the misunderstanding!

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They why did the confederate state’s formal declarations of succession say that slavery was the reason they were succeeding?

[–] wieson@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

secession, seceding

I don't think they were succeeding

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Remember when Republicans did shit recently in the name of "state's rights" to hate and then when states that didn't want Trump's bulashit said "oh let's pass our own laws to undo his cuntery" Republicans and Trump said these states had to follow federal law?

Ra damn Trump and Republicans are hypocrites.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Technically it was over a state's rights to ban slavery.

The slavers really hated that and wanted to expand as much as possible.