196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
view the rest of the comments
when watching this with a conscience, it’s impossible not to think of the many Palestinian parents who’ll never see their kids again, and of the many Palestinian kids who’ll never see their parents again.
fuck this scumbag and his ilk. may all zionists die in pain.
I vaguely remember a story about Israeli hostages that escaped from captivity, and the IDF soldiers lit them up. They just love to kill. Women, children. Medics, journalists. Young American activists, flattened with a bulldozer
Don't forget that the IDF literally partially arose from far-right militia, those being Irgun and Lehi.
The pre-IDF forces killed a Dutch Jew (Jacob Israël de Haan) who was critical of Zionism. The perpetator, Tehomi, was left scot-free and was involved in illegal activities. May he rot in the nothingness.
But that said, what this teaches is that it is the more reason to stand unified: whether someone is a Jew or Israeli or not, does not matter: all that matters is that we stand for humanity and criticise hatred together. Is it not then the stronger, when an Israeli does speak out against their own people repressing Palestinians? Should not all be comrades in arms against hatred and discrimination?
The hostages were even shirtless, to make sure that the IDF knew they weren't threats. They can't even say that they thought the hostages were Hamas; they thought they were Palestinian civilians.
Wait, the IDF shot the Israelis?
Look into the Hannibal Directive
There was an incident when they shot their own hostages, yes. At least once.
can’t interrupt a good killing spree I suppose
What the hell? TIL. Thank you.
I swear, I hate this god damned world.
Nah I don't think all Israelis are genocidal maniacs. Just, uhm, remove the the Zionists and that's it, no need to profile people based on factors they can't control, which is exactly what the IDF are doing in Palestine.
you're right, there's certainly some people born in israel who are good and resist their government. my comment isn't aimed at them. and i wish the same suffering onto non-israelis who support and finance this genocide.
i've changed my comment to reflect what i mean better
Wow, a person accepting criticism and changing their ways. Truly a breath of fresh air in the toxic shithole most of the internet is.
I disagree with the decision of taking the criticism, and not so sure I can even accept it. Mind you my position may be considered extreme.
How do you not blame the populace for the failings of a so-called democracy? Same thing in USA. Sure, not all voters are pro-Trump, but collectively the action or in-action resulted in whatever the fuck we have going on is.
It's a nuance or what exactly you condemn. Being Israeli isn't strictly a factor everyone can control and resenting people for their place of birth is unfair. Even if the two were perfectly interchangeable, the choice "Zionists" shifts the focus from "who" to "what for". The repulsive trait is genocidal ambition, not nationality.
It's also a question of scope: "Zionists" includes non-Israeli Zionists.
Right, why would that justify making the claim that every voter in a "democracy" is a fascist? (I'm aware you already said that not all voters are pro-Trump, but @carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone's comment said that every Israeli deserves to die, which is the part that I disagreed with) There are certainly good people in every country of the world, and making any kind of generalization that makes it look like the majority's opinion is the opinion of the entire populace is disingenuous and dangerous.
Point taken. Thank you for explaining.
If you had a building with 1000 evil people, and 1 good person, is it ok to destroy it? I don't know the answer to that, but I wouldn't be able to do it personally. Seems like a variant of the trolley problem.
OK but let's dig into the semantics of this. Would you offer the same criticism of someone who quipped about "all men being dangerous?" How about "All republicans are fascist?" Surely not all Republicans; hell, George Conway has built a new media career as a non-trump republican. Or can we agree that browbeating people for not accounting for granular differences when discussing broad trends in a casual setting is kinda dickish? Also per jpost 90% of Israelis consider themselves Zionist; I'm sure the 10% aren't going to quibble at generalizations.
Yes, a man didn't choose to be a man. A republican sure did choose to be a republican, which is a, to put it lightly, dubious choice in this day and age, but I still wouldn't say all of them are fascist.
Saying that all Israelis should die a painful death is still kinda crazy, and I don't think it's "dickish" to point that out.
It's not just crazy. It is itself arguably advocating for genocide
Yeah, lemmy absolutely hates when you imply that voters may actually be responsible for the consequences of their voting or non-voting. Not a lot of people took a civics course in here. And the loudest voices clearly have no idea how the US federal government works at a fundamental level. It's fun here.
OK but like, I hardly believe any well-meaning Israeli couldn't tell the difference from your initial statement. The person who incited this response made the exact same argument that assholes make about "not all men"
true but it still felt necessary to clarify. i don’t want to be accused of advocating for genocide either, like what someone else implied.
Only 80%+ as per every poll asking their opinion on whether the IDF should continue to commit genocide.
So I guess somewhere between 10 and 20 percent of Israelis AREN'T fucking monsters.
I don't tend to judge people based on nationality alone (since that's by definition bigotry in almost all cases)and I don't agree that they should all DIE, but when you're part of a population that so overwhelmingly support some of the worst and most thoroughly documented crimes against humanity in history, you're a monster until you prove otherwise by explicitly opposing it.
The term "Zionists" both more accurately captures the genocidal maniacs and includes those outside of Israel.
Last I checked Israeli support for ethnically cleansing Palestine sits well above 50%.
preferring all those who support the genocide and increasing reactionarism to face consequences.
heyhi dear chloé 🥕, how do u doooo? ~
yesyes evil shooting peeps - do not like. will not have a tea with.
hiiiii maria!! ^w^
this is um. a bit awkward. but i’m fine, just very angry at the people who carry out and support this genocide. what’s worse is i feel powerless to stop them…
i hope you’re going well too 😅
oh yea nonono this is obviously very bad and stuff and bad people doing bad things opposing bad things onto not-bad people, no question.
im doing pretty good, thank u for asking <3
isn't that a repeat of the Holocaust though? that's fighting fire with fire...
No it'd be a repeat of any genocide. "Isreali" doesn't mean Jew BTW.
It doesn't, but it also doesn't always mean "people who support genocide" or "people who chose to settle on occupied land"
Obviously it's still the majority that think it's okay to just bomb and shoot any Palestinian, rip them from their homes, etc, but about 1 in 5 Israelis don't support the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, and about 1 in 3 disagree that there are no innocents in Gaza. It should terrify us that 4 in 5 and 2 in 3 Israelis agree with these statements, but of course it doesn't justify killing all of them as the original person stated.
Be Careful! You might be banned from big fediverse instances!