this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
91 points (96.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

4832 readers
98 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homes@piefed.world 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

“All Steam Games With LGBTQ+ Content Blocked From Release in China and Russia Due to Local Bigorty Laws Limiting Such Content”

Funny how rearranging a few words can shift blame around. Thanks, Fascist propagandists, and their collaborators.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly, its the county's fault, not steams fault.

[–] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's amazing how valve gets a free pass.

Coke has the balls to even just sell their product in Russia: you fucking greedy donkey.

Valve goes along blocking lgtb games, just following orders boss.

Just fantastic.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So what should steam do, break the law in those countires?

[–] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Stop selling games. Leave the country and tell people to fuck off. Cause outage.

Out of every big company out there, steam has the easiest path forward to do so. No shareholders. Gabe can easily do what's right. He won't though. Too busy playing scientist on his yacht funding his kids racing career while moron gamers give him a free pass on his monopoly because valve is such a cool company 🙄.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

How is that going for McDonalds in Iran. Has the people outraged the government yet?

Should they withdraw from the US as well for their support of Israel? Or their immigration abuses? Or for the rampant corruption?

Companies generally operate in any country meeting the requirements of anyone that is not in breach of international law.

Leave activism to people and politicians.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I think putting (edit: some of) the heat on Valve here is reasonable. If they had a principled stance on being pro-LGBTQ+, they might refuse to sell any games in those regions. But they are choosing instead to let the lgbtq+ folks take the hit so that they can continue to rake in the big bucks from those regions.

Obviously I wouldn't actually expect an enormous capital driven machine like Valve to do something like that, but its just an extra nudge on the gauge of my opinion of them as a company

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are you okay with losing all your Steam games once your country also passes such a law?

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd cheer valve on for taking a principled stance against bigotry in my country while personally grieving the loss of my steam library.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I doubt it'll make a difference. Also almost all my LGBTQ friends are huge gamers. It's an escape, and often provides online community. And I'm in a very liberal country and they still need it here. Can't imagine the need for it in China or Russia. Whether that's healthy is a big question, but the rug pull definitely won't be.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess there's an argument to be made for just stopping selling games in those regions while keeping access to existing libraries

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

That's a looot of users they'd need to support without seeing any money from them. Might be worth it if they expect the laws to be temporary.

[–] makeshift0546@lemmy.today -2 points 1 week ago

Be a good little fedi, put your money where you mouth is and get ready to sacrifice. Jesus Christ, 'waahhhhh, I'd have to start stealing my games '.

Jesus Christ the second valve gets involved you all become spinless DNC cunts.

[–] homes@piefed.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Steam didn’t make the decision, China and Russia did

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

Steam is making a decision by continuing to do business in regions that made those decisions

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

In the case of China, Steam very much made this decision on their own, or received bad advice and did so.

[–] Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago

But they happily obeyed the orders of Russia and China.
Why do you run cover for a face- and soulless corporation like Valve?

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're not even blocked. Valve did the absolute bare minimum to skirt past China's restrictions. The only thing they did was make it so you can't search or filter by that tag. The tagged games themselves remain accessible.