this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
267 points (95.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

42802 readers
341 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Electric cars have to make noise on purpose because otherwise it would be a silent car. And most of these noises are are weird futuristic WEEEE-00000 UFO sounds. Therefore I posit that we should be able to change the noises our electric cars make

EDIT: These suggestions are Top-Notch! Keep em coming!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't think the manufacturers want to open that can of worms. You do have a choice of different sounds on some cars. I think it's good that they all sound similar, making them more recognisable.

Old hybrids didn't have those sounds and they're dead quiet at low speeds which is creepy.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also, if you can customise the sound, you can remove the sound, which would defeat the purpose of the regulations.

[–] DoubleDongle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can remove the sound anyway. Some cars will throw an error if the speaker is missing, but you can buy hardware to fool it. Just a resistor with the right connector. Easy peasy. I'm pretty sure it's not even illegal, it only has to be sold that way.

Ever snuck up on someone in a seven thousand pound chungus-mobile? I have. It's hilarious.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Of course it can be done, but that doesn't mean that it should be made easier to do.

[–] jumponboard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It is my car. I should be able to do with it whatever I want!

I can remove the airbag, but do I really want to do that?

I can remove the exhaust (on an old car) and drive without it. It's not efficient and not legal but I can do it. I won't do it because if I get caught I have to pay a fine and I want a good car. Same for the sound. If I get caught, I'd have to pay a fine.

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's just because where you live it's the wild west but in other parts of the world removing an airbag or changing an exhaust without certification is a periodic inspection failure and you can't drive that vehicle on public roads until you fix it.

Not that I'm personally a fan of the more invasive requirements, but there are things that affect others and if someone doesn't have the respect or brain cells to avoid bothering others then a common ground needs to be set for everyone's safety and comfort. That includes the noise you make going down the residential street.

[–] jumponboard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Huh? I talk about having the physical possibility.

I want to be able to change anything on my car. If I can't change it, I am not the one who is in charge, I don't own it. If I can't change the sound, who is in control of the car?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well then you can change the sound of the car. You might have to bypass or add your own equipment, but you can do it.

Doesn't mean the manufacturer should reasonably be expected to make it even easier.

[–] jumponboard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, that is exactly the point. You have to replace the part because you are not in control of it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Driving a car is a privilege, not a right.

When we're talking about the safety of others, and a machine that results in millions of deaths per year worldwide, I could not care less if you're sad that you can't change something in your car. Get over it.

[–] jumponboard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Please read again, you're missing the point

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

I won't do it because if I get caught I have to pay a fine

Yeah maybe this is a problem. Maybe you should have actual reasons to not remove your exhaust beyond "I don't want to pay a fine"

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I can remove the exhaust (on an old car) and drive without it. It’s not efficient and not legal but I can do it.

Then you "can't" do it by the same logic. Because it's not legal.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ftJX_HZ5S4g

Somehow when I first saw this it didn't seem like an ad.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Recognizability is the key. That is the entire purpose of the fake car sounds: to have your car make noises that bystanders will immediately recognize as a nearby car. It's a safety feature. The ability to change it to an arbitrary audio file negatively impacts a safety standard. Same reason why rainbow crosswalks are a bad idea.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Had me in the first half, ngl.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's not exactly the same thing, but it is analogous. Taking a standardized zebra striped crosswalk and recoloring it for any reason (pride, sports team colors, etc.) is taking away from that standardization, reducing safety.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It depends what you understand the purpose and effect of a crosswalk to be.

If you think it’s basically a signpost on the road saying “there might be pedestrians here” then the standardization is perhaps important. But even then there’s a decent amount of latitude as long as the feature is recognizable.

If it’s just visual noise that makes people uncomfortable to go fast through, then the specific design is far less important. (“Friction” as described in this video.)