this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
115 points (98.3% liked)

Buy European

10537 readers
422 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Interesting numbers from Qobuz, a french music streaming service. But the press releases have slightly different emphasis on being european in the different languages.

The first paragraph of this press release in german reads (translated):

Qobuz proves that a European alternative that relies on sound quality and human curation can also find its audience in a mass market dominated by tech giants and achieve a positive balance.

In the french and english version it reads:

The success story of an independent French company that has become a global player alongside the music streaming giants.

It seems they only emphasize being european in the german press release, it's missing from the english and french version.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] apotheotic@beehaw.org 29 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They're humble about it, but the revenue share that they pay to rights holders (which is then paid to artists) dwarfs every other big player in the streaming industry. Based qobuz.

[โ€“] hash@slrpnk.net 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Able to comment on availability of music on the platform? I'd hope they have pretty much everything if they're paying more than others but it's never that simple.

[โ€“] Wfh@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I switched from Apple Music yesterday. Most of my library was transferred, except from a few of my favorite albums (early albums from Carpenter Brut or Perturbator that wold be very hard to buy today) and a few singles. Weirdly, some very obscure black metal bands are available but not some mainstream singles from the 90'.

[โ€“] apotheotic@beehaw.org 9 points 3 days ago

Everything I haven't been able to find on bandcamp has been on qobuz and vice versa - I dont use the streaming section of either but I assume the catalogues between their download store and streaming are the same. Qobuz is pretty good coverage!

[โ€“] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I switched from Spotify to Qobuz and I've only missed two artists in my regular mix of ~30. And for one of them only their old albums are missing, the new ones are uploaded. They probably changed labels.

[โ€“] squirrel@cake.kobel.fyi 6 points 3 days ago

I've emailed some labels to notify them about specific albums not being available on Qobuz. It worked one time and the album is now available. Most of the time it takes only one click at their digital distributor to opt-in to Qobuz.

[โ€“] abc@suppo.fi 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That might just be a function of popularity and scale though. Spotify has 750M active users. Qobuz (by this article) reached 1.2M in 2025.

They might be paying more from the goodness of their hearts or they might be paying more because they have no leverage. As the artist, if you get roughly 70x more streamings but each streaming is half the price, you're gonna get more money obviously.

[โ€“] apotheotic@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

Sure but evidently it is proving to be a profitable and sustainable business model

[โ€“] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does it? My understanding is that it's approximately 70% of revenue which is in line with basically every other player in the space.

[โ€“] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If that's the case then they're simply making more revenue per stream and clearly users are still on board so end result is qobuz wins users win and artists win

Edit: I say this because their "artists get X amount per stream on average" value is far higher than other players in the industry

[โ€“] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Following this logic, artists get more value from users if the users stream music less, since there will be a lower total amount of streams, making each stream be a larger share of the monthly fee they pay to the platform.

Which is clearly not the case - the artists still get to share the โ‚ฌ13 the users pay per month, regardless of how many streams they actually happen to play in any given month.

The truth is that "pay per stream" as a metric to compare music streaming services has always been pretty much meaningless

[โ€“] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 3 hours ago

That is a valid point.