this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
-3 points (40.0% liked)
Friendly Carnivore
101 readers
4 users here now
Carnivore
The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet
Meat Heals.
We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.
Keep being AWESOME
We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type
Purpose
- lifestyle
- food
- Science
- problems
- Recipes
- Sustainability
- Regenerative lifestyle
Rules
- Be nice
- Stay on topic
- Don't farm rage
- Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
- No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
- No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.
Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods
Meta
If you need to block this community and the UI won't let you, go to settings -> blocks you can add it.
[Meta] Moderation Policy for Niche Communities
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
they just take poore-nemecek and plug it into their research. no discussion on the problem of combining disparately methodized lca data.
I have to admit to being a complete layperson when it comes to this domain, so the best I could do was a general critical reading of the paper, based on what little I know.
Thank you for providing some details as to how to start. I will look up and read Poore-Nemecek 2018.
I'm totally out of the loop on the nutritional side of this so I usually stay in my lane. I've read a lot of the lit on the environmental side and I can say with certainty that all the claims made about food production might be true, but the research simply isn't properly methodized to support it.
This also applies 100% to the state of nutritional science:
I can say with certainty that all the claims made about food nutrition might be true, but the research simply isn’t properly methodized to support it.
it's actually a tragic state for the academy. no reproducible studies. bad methodology. and everyone citing each other uncritically. it would be nice to have good data on ecology and nutrition, but everyone is so focused on just getting the paper out that no one is trying to advance the science.
Indeed, throw in some philosophical motivations and we the modern literature. In nutrition we see people outside the normal western academic circles doing studies and collecting data not aligned with the previous zeitgeists - so there is hope the literature will start to have meaningful impact going forward.