this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
82 points (93.6% liked)

Canada

12024 readers
311 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This is horrible, what was done to the Indigenous peoples in Canada. It's horrible if done to any people. I think the word genocide is a bit strong in this case but, to open a can of worms, at what point are we no longer responsible for the sins of our fathers?

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 7 points 1 day ago

at what point are we no longer responsible for the sins of our fathers?

When everyone is living well.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article after giving context about genocide by mentionning the grave of indigenous children talk about recent genocidal policies effective today. So yeah the article is not about blaming today people for the sins of their fathers like you claimed

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I claimed nothing. I asked a question.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

You asked a rhetorical question to pass the claim that people blame currrnt people for the sin of their fathers, while the article critisize current genocidal policies

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Genocide" is in fact appropriate when speaking of some specific tribes—ask any Beothuk. Oh, wait . . .

Granted, not many tribes were completely destroyed, so the pedantically correct charge in most cases is probably attempted (but not successful) genocide. At what point does the government, and by extension the non-indigenous population of Canada, cease to be held responsible? All I can say is, not yet. The last residential schools didn't close all that long ago, and the government is still periodically lashing out in court against its treaty obligations toward Indigenous peoples. At minimum, we have several more generations to go.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I agree, and nicely stated.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

and the government is still periodically lashing out in court against its treaty obligations toward Indigenous peoples.

Some provincial governments (hello Alberta) are doing that and worse.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"How terrible, but not that bad." Yup, that's a Canadian.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Changing what I said is what the billionaire media does. Good on you, you have big aspirations.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"You're working for the billionaires by recognizing genocide of indigenous peoples." How tf don't you drown in the shower?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because when I shower I let people know, so I can be revived. How can you not see that? You need to try and expand your thoughts to more than just disdain and insults. Go have some fun!