this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
384 points (94.9% liked)

People Twitter

9998 readers
895 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 81 points 3 hours ago (8 children)

I keep seeing this content that’s “men are so stupid and inferior and awful” and it’s grating on me.

Like, yes, there’s definitely a strong toxic subset of men, but most of use are just… normal?

I’m in my mid 30s, when the women aren’t around we’re mostly talking about kids (those who have them), hockey, finances, house stuff, and weird health issues. Depending on the group, how stupid politics/government shit is lately.

I don’t know. It feels like the toxicity that came for incels is coming at women hard these last few years. Reddit really pushes this stuff lately.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 55 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I keep seeing this content that’s “men are so stupid and inferior and awful” and it’s grating on me.

That's because it's troll bait. Just like all generations have a bigger than wanted set of shitty people. I don't feel like I can take this shit down because it's not breaking any rules. You all can help by not falling for the bait though.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I appreciate you following the rules but tbh ragebait should be on of them. Lemmy is getting flooded with it lately. So many old, stupid social Twitter posts that do nothing but rile people up

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

This has 300+ upvotes right now though. I ethically agree with you, but I took over this community. If the community upvotes this sort of thing, I don't feel like I have the right to remove it because I think it's stupid and causes harm. I really want to, ha ha.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 20 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Definitely this. It circulates widely because it generates outrage, even though the number of people who actually believe this is miniscule. This is the same technique right-wing media uses

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It might even be the same people. I suspect that, but don't have any proof.

[–] Town@lemmy.zip 4 points 44 minutes ago

Russia has repeatedly and explicitly said they are playing both sides of the US/Western political divide against each other in online rate campaigns.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 minutes ago

People are talking to people in real life less and less these day. The people they do talk to tend to be of the same gender, this was a thing before the Internet but the Internet has made it worse. Combine that with algorithms where the first thing they learn about you is your gender and will feed you content accordingly, peoples view of the opposite gender becomes more and more distorted. So the terminally online people, that also make a lot of the content on the Internet, tend to become misogynist or misandrist.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 41 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

I will say i have zero appreciation for "nice" things and the house looking cozy or whatever. If it were up to me I would live in a bare apartment with everything painted white and minimal furniture. And there's nothing wrong with that and i have no reason to change.

Of all the things that are wrong with me and perhaps other men, this is just not one of them, it's just a style preference, there's zero morality involved. Whoever doesn't like it can just not fuck with me, just like i dont fuck with decorations.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 2 points 47 minutes ago

I upvoted because the two panel underneath is mocking the ragebait post.

[–] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I hate to use that term though because I love femcel communities here on fediverse. They probably got the best memes in the verse.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I still haven't figured put what the deal is with that place, and at this point I'm too afraid to ask.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 8 minutes ago

i just kinda showed up there and hoped no one would notice i'm married, but my wife is awesome i like to talk about her. and they're pretty cool on the community so 😘

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I first read that as "horse stuff" and was wondering if horses were suddenly in now

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

It's really prevalent, but it's unfortunately hard to call out, especially irl.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The thing no one wants to admit or say is that while the modern (MeToo and onward) feminist movement certainly has good intentions, its been broadly co opted into a kind of pop-feminism that's about as actually feminist as tik tok psychology advice is real psychology.

Its morphed into basically just a semi-formalized worldview of mystic misandry.

'Manifesting', the Patriarchy as essentially an evil spiritual or god-like entity or force, which everything else is oriented around and against... while simultaneously claiming that adherents need to 'de-center men' ... near total abandonment of any attempt to empathize with the 'other', active glee in demonizing them... whole bunch of 'creators' just vying to be the most bombastic mini cult leader...

Its even got a discernible dialect.

They believe dogmas. When you try to inquire as to the basis or validity of those dogmas... they attack.

You get a bunch of faux psychoanalysis of how you could possibly have ended up so broken as to question their... you know, idea that they can't or won't actually defend.

Its like a religious fundamentalist launching into a semi-canned apologia response.