this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
385 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

85619 readers
3518 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Plex has announced a massive price increase on the service's Lifetime Plex Pass. On July 1, the lifetime subscription option will go from $249.99 to $749.99, an increase of 200%. The price hike will only apply to new subscribers, with no changes to monthly or annual subscription pricing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I don't know why anyone would pay that instead of using Jellyfin. I've had my server up for years now and it works great.

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I haven’t checked in on Jellyfin for a while now, but don’t they still have issues with hardware transcoding support?

Not to mention the lack of software clients on other platforms for just playback that Plex has been established on for years and even multiple device generations like with PlayStation, Roku, Fire Stick, etc.?

Also you have to configure your own reverse proxy / Tailscale set up to securely access a content library remotely, right - as opposed Plex’s relatively simpler remote access configuration?

[–] warm@kbin.earth 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Surprise, surprise, a paid product with salaried developers has more features than a volunteer project!

More people using Jellyfin, more people who will contribute, through code or donations. It's worth a downside to swap over.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago

Especially given the new "lifetime" price. More people will switch to Jellyfin. Plex lifetime might be shorter.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More people using Jellyfin, more people who will contribute, through code or donations.

Doubt.

What about Emby? Why is that never mentioned?

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Because Emby is a closed source application and Lemmy is an open source platform with community member who prefer open source solutions to closed source. Your out here screaming at Linux bros "why not choose apple??"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Especially on non-GPU systems, Jellyfin is slower at transcoding than Plex. I don’t know the internals, but I have both running in the sam machine, and Plex is always noticeably more responsive. Not by a huge margin, but still it is.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have zero experience with those two products but when it comes to transcoding there are various toggles that affect the quality and speed.

It looks also like commercial products generally optimize for speed while open source tends to be more concerned about quality.

Of course this could be completely wrong in this case but that's the general tendency I noticed. Do they allow to change settings?

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 1 points 4 weeks ago

They do, and I experimented with both, but wasn’t able to get better performance from Jellyfin compared to Plex. Always running on the same hardware. Still run both though, just in case.

[–] Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I have not personally experienced any issues with hardware transcoding. My server is an old Dell Optiplex and I use clients on Linux, Android, Roku and Shield.

Yes you are correct about remote access and if that was a priority for me, I would happily learn that part instead of paying for Plex.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What kinds of issues? I put an Intel Arc in my server and it's working fine AFAICT.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Last I looked, jellyfin auth and public facing security were less than ideal.

How far has that come in the last few years? I have plenty of people using my Plex and it's been secure. I had heard a public facing Jellyfin wasn't super secure.

Honestly, 95% of the reason I use Plex is so I don't have to manage user passwords and troubleshoot issues for my friends and family. I just grant access.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I moved from the default jellyfin login method to using Authentik as the identity provider. Now its part of my homelab setup where all services have SSO, and I don't have to create/manage an account for each person for each service.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does that break Jellyfin apps on smart TVs or media devices?

A lot of people seem to have concerns with how Jellyfin handles access control and some have stated that the developers marked some major issues as “won’t fix”. Is there somewhere I can catch up on that?

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 2 points 1 month ago

LDAP works fine, OIDC not so much, only the web client would work.

There are still talks around making OIDC a first class citizen and IIRC it is planned as per the feature page but I guess the major core upgrade around the DB took a lot of attention the last 6-12 months.

But in the meantime I've just spun up an LDAP outpost for my Authentik that my Jellyfin connects to. It breaks MFA but otherwise it works. It may be a bit confusing for users that they log in at jellyfin.site.com but anything user-related like updating password is at authentik.site.com and requires an extra login.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This. I run a Kubernetes cluster and self host tons of shit . . . but I do NOT want to be dealing with client issues for Boomer relatives and worrying about securing servers that a Samsung TV needs to auth with

[–] Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I only need my server to work locally so I haven't messed with that part personally. But I've read that setting up tailscale is straightforward and works fine. There are many other solutions to the problem. I would definitely invest a lot of effort before paying for Plex.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Great; how do I setup Tailscale on my mother’s Roku TV?

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

Unfortunately, that's probably not gonna happen without some new hardware.

You could setup a wire guard at the router (can you setup tail scale on a router? idk). If she's renting the ISP router, replacing that could save a 100+ a year, depending on how much the isp is scamming her for it.

or you could repurpose a minipc/nuc from bay and set up a jellyfin streaming box with tailscale.

If you have the extra hardware, you could also setup a local server with her jellyfin and use wiregaurd/tailscale to remotely connect to it and run backup/sync during off-hours.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 1 points 1 month ago (7 children)

You could also set up a reverse proxy in front of your Jellyfin and hook a domain up to it. That way you don't have to worry about the client at all.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-ar300m/

Configure one of these to sit between the TV and your mother's network and pass all the tv traffic through an exit node on your jellyfin network.

Most smart TVs have a tailscale app you can install directly on device. Roku is an exception to that.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love their routers but that one doesn't have tailscale support, even if you did manage to install it (I did so on a mango) I think it would run extremely poorly

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Funny enough I actually meant to link this one, which is specifically for this purpose. https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-mt5000/

That's okay though because the guy I was replying to didn't actually want the help. He just wanted to complain that people aren't recommending his preferred software.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

That's a better choice, got one myself the other day, haven't actually had a chance to try it but their support has literally sent me firmware ahead of release (for mango), they fix their stuff.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Nope. How do I do it on the TV directly?

I bring this up every time someone parrots off the Lemmy line of “Jellyfin” because that’s all you all know. Not what’s best for the use case, just ram Jellyfin in there shortcoming and all.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's essentially a one time fee for an indefinite service of handling the vpn side of the setup.

I use Jellyfin on my local network and plex externally because I don't know how to route specific traffic with openvpn on my phone and can't be bothered switching it off and on when streaming things 😅

I'm not sure how it's sustainable, and am surprised they still offer the life pass at all though.

I guess a lot of people buy it who don't need it?

I still probably wouldn't pay the current price for it though, I got it about a decade ago lol.

Oh also plexamp has a better UX than jellyfin for music, but I don't think that alone would justify the current price.

[–] Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're not wrong. I would just rather learn Headscale or nginx or any other option than pay that Plex subscription. But I'm sure there are people out there who have extremely valuable time and wouldn't hesitate to fork over 750.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 month ago

ah yeah, I paid $50, not $750 😂

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don’t believe plex pass acts as a vpn.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 month ago

yeah but it removes the need for one in most use cases

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It kinda does when streaming remotely, if you don't have any open ports it gets routed through Plex's servers

It's not literally a VPN no but it does route data

[–] jumponboard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

How much do you donate to jellyfin? If I sum up my 20 bucks per year for the next 50 years, I end up with 1000 bucks. If I wanted to pay today, I'd donate even more to jellyfin. (Neglecting inflation)

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't looked at Emby in a long time. Last I checked, it wasn't as capable or feature rich as Jellyfin or Plex

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not as feature rich as plex, sure. Emby be Jellyfin? Emby wins by a country mile.

[–] Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If it works for you, great!