this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
425 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

84668 readers
5196 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

I can assure you FBI scanned it for secret cameras.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Like that's enough lol.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 97 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

The FBI missed a passive bug that hung in the office of the US ambassador to Russia for 7 years.

Don't count them out yet

Fascinating stuff: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

[–] leoj@piefed.social 73 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

I feel like it is entirely plausible to miss something when scanning, I believe it is extremely plausible to miss something when scanning an entire jet aircraft, regardless of the skills of the personnel involved.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 8 points 12 hours ago

A jet has multiple integrated digital systems meaning it would be super easy to hide things within the wiring or on circuit boards, which is exactly what security professionals said when they accepted the plane - it could never be made truly safe without being gutted - but they didn't listen.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 67 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I mean "The Thing" wasn't detected for seven years. It's always possible to miss a listening device.

[–] leoj@piefed.social 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like I had to have heard of this device before, but that article was a fascinating read - thank you!

I think people still think of China as a second tier sometimes, but from what I have seen their technology is likely at least equal to ours, and I would imagine the West and China both surpass each other in different technological categories.

[–] billy@piefed.zip 11 points 20 hours ago

Lol China is far superior to our tech. They get to manufacture everything we design. Then get to ponder on improvements. Not to mention their "students" in all our universities.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wasn't sure if this was going to be a radio interference post, or John Carpenter

[–] No1@aussie.zone 3 points 16 hours ago

The dog peeling like a banana was what convinced me....

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Links broken or page is broken

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I think your client isn't handling the markdown correctly. Link without markdown:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Interesting. No idea what markdown means. Thanks.

[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

By "the FBI scanned", they probably mean "We told Kash Patel that there was a six pack of Miller hidden somewhere in the plane and let him have at it."

[–] leoj@piefed.social 15 points 21 hours ago

Right? I was like "Faith in the FBI? Someone didn't watch the Mens Hockey gold medal match..."

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

…and secret whiskey stashes…
👀

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time.