this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
477 points (92.5% liked)

Science Memes

20141 readers
2125 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But the way it works is only the top one if im not mistaken

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, no. Not if you put a detector in one of the slits. It collapses the wave function, and the interference pattern disappears. The meme is a joke that your eyeballs are the detector, which is not true.

I was making a bit of a joke myself to get people to think about when the collapse actually happens. It could occur as late as when you look at the screen, and you can't prove otherwise. You know... like, "is the moon still there when you're not looking at it?" Except for real.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's basically the bohr-einstsein problem isnt it?

[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 hours ago

Not exactly. At least I don't think. Einstein didn't believe in quantum mechanics at all, or that it was inherently random until measured. Bohr said it was, but I don't think he necessarily equated conscious observation with measurement. Einstein believed there must be hidden variables, but if there are, they're non-local.