this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
280 points (80.0% liked)

Science Memes

20126 readers
1140 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/68257855

Nuclear is the best btw.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nuclear is an either or situation.

No its not, how did you make up that conclusion? You can absolutely have both and you should.

Nuclear can be used to reduce the need for rather expensive storage for solar/wind energy.

You know what many places do now when solar falls short or at nighttime when the sun does not shine? They burn gas, oil, or coal.

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes and that nuclear power plant is not shut down at day time. Instead renewables will be throttled if there is an overproduction. That is the either/or scenario that I mean. Every watt that is produced by a nuclear power plant is pretty much a constant and displaces renewables. It also keeps the base energy costs high because they are constantly running.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

By putting a higher percentage on nuclear you reduce the need to create storage capabilities. Nuclear should ideally cover a majority of nighttime hours with the rest being handled through solar storage and wind.

Yes this will be more expensive than the current solution which is to fire up the coal plants at night, but some costs are worth it. Maybe this can be handled by battery storage, but no one has done that yet so it is hard to gage the final cost.

I care just a little more about not burning fossil fuels than the cost

[–] chris@l.roofo.cc 1 points 1 day ago

Get lost with fossil fuels. In the time that enough nuclear is built we can build enough storage and renewables to make coal, gas and nuclear mostly obsolete.