this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
274 points (79.9% liked)

Science Memes

20126 readers
650 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/68257855

Nuclear is the best btw.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LilithElina@literature.cafe 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is a joke, right? I grew up near one of those "safe" underground disposals and it's a disaster. Why risk that when there are so mich cleaner optional available today?

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 9 hours ago

nuclear waste vs lead and iron

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

doesnt coal emissions have some radiation in it too?

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 1 points 27 minutes ago

IIRC, coal and gas plants give off more radiation per kWh than nuclear, it's just that they dump it into the atmosphere along with millions of tonnes of other far more dangerous material.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 day ago

I think the average person vastly over estimates how much waste is produced. If I recall the stat was that the entire world's nuclear waste could fit in a football field. That's really tiny.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Nuclear is the best btw

Naw. I was once enrolled in an Energy/Climate-focussed Masters degree, and scientific consensus for the goal generally seemed to range from "mostly renewables + a tiny bit of nuclear" to "all renewables". Nuclear feels like this amazing hack but it's expensive, and the storage problem, while sometimes overstated, is also often understated or falsely misrepresented as solved.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Forcing nuclear down our throats while renewables are a thing is so wild. And people actually defend nuclear.

You want mining of sparse minerals by workers in inhuman conditions? Check

You want a contamination which will exist for longer than the oldest human build structure? Check (because the barrels you made made indestructible, just dont test this pls)

You want centralized energy way more expansive than solar or wind? Check

There are literally no upsides of nuclear against renewables and a battery.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Therms45@europe.pub 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

pro-nuke when you tell them nuclear energy is fossil fuel energy: 😡

*wind and solar are unarguably the best energy sourcrs, and the only sustainable ones.

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it isn't tough, fossil fuel implies hydrocarbons, as that's where the fossil part comes from.

Nuclear fuel is non renewable but it is also clean.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's clean regarding chemical waste.

I've helped build nuclear waste caskets, nothing is perfect but the amount of attention put into making it safe is incredible! The layers (and quality) of stainless steel welds would put your average steel bridge to shame....

But fission will always be limited (as in non-renewable). If everything was powered by nuclear, I'm sure we'd see even more awefull mining operations. Also, fusion should in theory be much better, if the thermodynamics of it end up working.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 35 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Get lost with your expensive nuclear energy. Renewables produce MUCH cheaper energy.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

“Indestructible”?

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Thanks for the laugh, pal.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] M137@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

BREATHE*

More and more words are apparently becoming to hard to use correctly for a big part of people online. This is one that I almost never saw anyone getting wrong until a couple of years ago and it's becoming more and more common, same with writing "cloth/cloths" instead of "clothe/clothes". It's infuriating.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Only for grammar Facists. You know what people mean,

load more comments
view more: next ›