this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
62 points (83.0% liked)
Fediverse
41849 readers
359 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments



We have dedicated anti ai trolls who go and get banned from dozen of genai comms, make alts then go and get banned again. We have serial harassers who make dozen of accounts and go and spew bigotry. Your methodology is so flawed, it's laughable. Did you even check the age of the accounts being banned?The amount of comments? The amount of downvotes? Cross-reference with other instance bans? Check if their own instance banned them? Did you have any amount of rigor before throwing out your half-assed conclusions?
There's lies, damn lies, and statistics...
This is skewed by the mods who just ban people from their dozens of AI slop communities for a couple downvotes for stuff that came through the All feed.
Average age of accounts being banned, grouped by instance:
lemmy.dbzer0.com is towards the young side but not really out of the ordinary. It's the instances like lemmy.today, lemmy.zip and piefed.social that are unusual.
Average number of downvotes (lower attitude is a higher ratio of downvotes to upvotes. Always 1 on instances with no downvotes) when banned:
dbzer0 has 0.68 which is the same as lemmy.world or lemmy.ca.
What even is an "anti ai troll"? Is Big John Connor paying people to go to your instance and downvote AI posts? Or is it just a made up buzzword you use to legitimise banning people for downvoting stuff they don't like?
It's also at least partially explained by the fact we frequently take ban actions for reports of transphobia, or of zionism, for example. Whereas that only sometimes happens on the bigger instances who tend to draw their lines in different places, to put it delicately.
"But it's anti free speech to let people spew hate speech! You're just ban happy!"
They forget we are federated with hexbear too. That probably accounts for quite a few of them! lmao
Why don't you just not federate with authoritarians? Why tolerate authoritarianism when you're supposed to be anarchists?
You used to be a member there, making multiple alt accounts after each would eventually get banned didn’t you DroneRights/Dragon Rider?
Also iirc you recently said you would like to work alongside fascists, did you not?
I'm not either of those people and I don't want to work with fascists.
@eugenevdebs the freedom of association includes the freedom to not associate.
If it's about transphobia, why does blahaj have so many fewer bans than you? They're not zionists either.
3 bannable type of comments was mentioned and you only focused on one. blahaj do not have political communities and it is not pro AI to have bots downvoting AI
as devil's advocate i don't think account karma should be a factor. downvotes would only be an extension of how exclusionary the instance is. dbzer0's moderation is quite democratic, after all
Yeah, It's a weak point anyway. While the graphs aren't detailed research, there's also no reason to believe dbzer0's perspective on the same network includes 8 times as many new users as LW for some reason. Or all the users in their communities have 8x worse karma for some external reasons. So we probably need further research.