this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
182 points (88.2% liked)

Fediverse

41866 readers
330 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I did some analysis of the modlog and found this:

V8lPrxY1qxcISLe.png

Ok, bigger instances ban more often. Not surprising, because they have more communities and more users and more trouble. But hang on, dbzer0 isn't a very big instance. What happens if we do a ratio of bans vs number of users?

vyfUNYTrX9pHQeR.png

Ok, so lemmy.ml, dbzer0 and pawb are issue an outsized amount of bans for the number of users they have... But surely the number of communities the instance hosts is going to mean they have to ban more? Bans are used to moderate communities, not just to shield their user-base from the outside. Let's look at the number of bans per community hosted:

Yrc7TofOr88SeGt.png

Seems like dbzer0 really loves to ban. Even more than the marxists and the furries! What is it about dbzer0 that makes them such prolific banners?

Raw-ish numbers and calculations are in this spreadsheet if anyone wants to make their own charts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's also at least partially explained by the fact we frequently take ban actions for reports of transphobia, or of zionism, for example. Whereas that only sometimes happens on the bigger instances who tend to draw their lines in different places, to put it delicately.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"But it's anti free speech to let people spew hate speech! You're just ban happy!"

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They forget we are federated with hexbear too. That probably accounts for quite a few of them! lmao

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

They forget about it until it becomes convenient for them.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why don't you just not federate with authoritarians? Why tolerate authoritarianism when you're supposed to be anarchists?

[–] Loco_Mex@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You used to be a member there, making multiple alt accounts after each would eventually get banned didn’t you DroneRights/Dragon Rider?

Also iirc you recently said you would like to work alongside fascists, did you not?

[–] Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago

That's an ad hominem argument, even though (actually kind of because) it doesn't make them look nice. The question remains: Why not just defederate?

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not either of those people and I don't want to work with fascists.

[–] Fu@hostux.social 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

@eugenevdebs the freedom of association includes the freedom to not associate.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

It doesn't give one person license to make that decision for thousands of users, in a paternalistic way. Ask the damn users. Otherwise it's nothing but admins treating their instances like personal fiefdoms.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it's about transphobia, why does blahaj have so many fewer bans than you? They're not zionists either.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

3 bannable type of comments was mentioned and you only focused on one. blahaj do not have political communities and it is not pro AI to have bots downvoting AI