this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
21 points (95.7% liked)

Canada

12024 readers
600 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I understand the financial argument for mitigating risk. That argument makes sense individually. I think the implications are a bit different at the collective - national level. If Canada tanks and Auatralia is fine, sure CPP's runway remains longer and pensioners are paid, but the rest of the economy around them falling apart with high unemployment doesn't make for sustainable retirement. The pension payouts are only as good as what they can purchase. If the local economy can't sustain services and prices, what those pensions can actually buy here since pensioners don't live in Australia, can change dramatically. And in bad economic conditions locally, we need local investment to keep the economy able to deliver the goods and services us Canadians need, retirees included. This is why there's an argument made for pension funds to shift investment home. An argument Carney makes.