this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
1088 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

19671 readers
3219 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 74 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

Unless, those are microplastics, which are probably something that will always be there for us.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 60 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

They've detected microplastics in breast milk. You know what that means? It's time to start living up to our name as mammals.

We hormonally induce lactation for everyone. All the time. Just leech out those microplastics. Nips into 3d printers.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I walked into my break room at work a couple of years ago and overheard some of my female coworkers complaining about the formula shortage. I asked if they'd ever thought about breastfeeding and they looked at me like I'd just grown a second head. I get that some women here and there might need a supplement for this, but the idea that feeding babies canned formula should be the norm is completely insane.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Breast feeding is a huge amount of work, asking a person to do that and have a job is a big deal. Pumping breastmilk is incompatible with lots of jobs. If they have already stopped breastfeeding they may not be able to restart.

It would be great to live in a society where breastfeeding was normal and easy. Society is crazy and women shouldn't be criticised for trying to exist within it.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

We're school bus drivers lol. We work four hours a day.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 hours ago

Hey son, just don't eat for 4 hours...

It's not that simple, like at all. There are loads of other things to take into account too.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 23 points 22 hours ago

Sadly, the energy cost of making all that milk would require us to eat more, taking in more plastics.

[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 3 points 15 hours ago

That is not what I wanted those used for.

[–] nightshade@piefed.social 14 points 22 hours ago

I have nipples, Greg. Could you milk me?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Potential downside: For a while the world is gonna smell like curdled milk.

[–] 1dalm@lemmy.today 9 points 17 hours ago

Yeah the dude is really wrong.

Your body is good at filtering out hydrophilic toxins. But for just about every other toxin... Not so much. Most hydrophobic toxins and other toxins, like heavy metals, VOCs, pesticides, micro plastics, etc., are man made and your body hasn't had millions of years to evolve natural filters.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, valerian root ain't getting rid of your microplastics buildup.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 29 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Don't forget the heavy metals!

[–] nightshade@piefed.social 21 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Those are also worth taking into account. Mercury in seafood, for example. Some can be excreted by the human body, others can't.

[–] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Anyone talking about “toxins” and “waste products” as if they’re ‘stuck’ in your body is either very ignorant, or trying to sell you snake oil.

Some can be excreted by the human body, others can’t.

You contradicted yourself. The latter quote is true.

https://www.quora.com/How-long-does-it-take-for-heavy-metal-toxicity-to-clear-up/answer/Harri-K-Hiltunen

[–] unwillingsomnambulist@midwest.social 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Heavy metal is good for you. Gets you moving and can be cathartic. I prefer stoner, doom, or deathcore myself though. Load my body up with those types of metal.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Heavy metal is good for you.

Eh, the Moebius stuff was great but a lot of the material just pandered to adolescent boys.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

Moebius and Giger and Jodorowsky!

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, what do people mean "toxins are pseudoscience"?

What are microplastics, heavy metals, and PTFAs, then???

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You should to regularly ~~let~~ donate blood to expell the ~~bad humors~~ microplastics.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's right, pass those microplastics along to the cancer babies! (Seriously though, DONATE BLOOD.)

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 8 points 21 hours ago

In serious, most ways to loose blood and need blood infusions will loose the plastics too, so the donated blood just maintains the concentrations, the samw way it does for the other components.
Everyone has plastics in their blood.

But then if you donate frequently your blood will have lower concentrations due to all the previous donations, so don't just donate, donate often.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

AFAIK, still no conclusive studies that show microplastics having an overly adverse affect on the human body. I've seen one linking it to lower sperm counts, but that's not particularly bad to me. We don't need more people.

The big scare with microplastics is that they are everywhere and that certainly isn't good; and I think we're all just waiting for the shoe to drop and some study to come out that shows something majorly negative with them. But for now, there's nothing obvious sticking out that shows an immediate concern. Which makes sense. We use plastic for so much because it tends not to react to stuff.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago

Because they are so ubiquitous that it is impossible to find a control group. Quite literally every single person on the planet has micro plastics in them.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

AFAIK, still no conclusive studies that show microplastics having an overly adverse affect on the human body

The problem is that we'll never know because there's no control group. Everybody has them, even fetuses still in the womb. You would have to build bunkers with perfect air filtering, and then go through, like, four generations of humans to breed microplastics-free specimen, which you could then use a the control group for the rest... Only them never leaving the bunker would already invalidate the tests... So, yeah...

[–] 1dalm@lemmy.today 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If micro plastics were a problem then we should expect to see rapid increases in cancers in younger adults.

Handed a note

Huh. No shit.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Though even that is complicated by 50 or so years of nuclear weapons testing, which likely also increased cancer rates. Not to mention all that lead everywhere. Produce gradually losing nutrients because farming mostly just focuses on the big three with fertilizer and the others are being mined out of the ground and sent to landfills, septic tanks, waste processing facilities, cemetaries, and crematoriums also doesn't help (though I'm not sure waste processing and crematoriums remove those nutrients from the cycle like the others, since the one could produce fertilizer and the other might be sending it out into the atmosphere where it could eventually end up back in the soil).

There's so much chaos that it's hard to isolate causes, which then makes all the causes kinda "hide in plain sight" because they can perpetually blame the others and shit only gets worse over time.

[–] xep@discuss.online 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Let's not forget the industrial pesticides, which are also everywhere.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

We haven't noticed much in the way of short term effects, but there's no way to know what long term effects there will be except to wait.

In the meantime, since the effects are... unlikely to be beneficial, the best thing to do is reduce exposure as much as possible.

[–] nightshade@piefed.social 8 points 23 hours ago

Good point, those exist. I don't think we know yet what all of the consequences are, but they're obviously not good for us.