this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
444 points (96.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

30210 readers
1100 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

me like use nano. nano say how do thing. nano exit easy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 26 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

micro enters the chat.

Static, portable binary with no dependencies.

Out of the box:

  • Syntax highlighting
  • Multi-line cursors like Sublime Text
  • Mouse support (works incredibly well)
  • Splits and tabs for working on multiple files
  • Diff gutter
  • Copy and paste with system clipboard
  • Cross-platform (runs basically on anything that Go does)
  • Sane key binds (ctrl-s, ctrl-c, ctrl-v, ctrl-z, ctrl-x, etc)
  • Terminal emulator
  • Plugin system to extend it
  • And much much more

I have nothing to do with the project but this binary is the absolute best. curl or wget to any host and away you go with effectively a Sublime Text / VSCode like in the terminal. It’s as simple as nano and as functional as a well configured and extended vim.

It’s baffling it’s not more well known and not installed by default on major distros.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 12 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

That’s not a text editor, that’s an IDE.

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

And emacs is an operating system 😂

[–] ramasses@social.ozymandias.club 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

I'm glad we all agree that nano is the one true text editor.

/s

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

IMO it needs better LSP support and things like refactoring, smart auto completion, and go to definition for a range of languages to be considered an ide.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 5 points 16 hours ago

I use nano because I can't be assed to memorize key bindings, but I'll give this a go

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If only I could get copy paste working when using micro over ssh. inside a document it works fine but I can't get it to put stuff on my system clipboard

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

to use the system clipboard I select with the mouse while holding shift, then do ctrl-shift-c iirc. That'll use the terminal emulator highlight and the system clipboard. At least on my machine, using kitty. Idk all the pieces that need to be in place for this to work.

[–] CodeMonkey@programming.dev -4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

How many Linux distros include micro in their minimal image? Vim, emacs, and nano are good because I can connect to just about any container or Linux VM and expect to have all of them available.

Let's say I have a test that always passes on my machine but fails in CI. If I can get a terminal on the test runner, I can open up my test code in vim, add extra logging and error handling, and rerun the test to check my fix.

I am not going to install additional editors in a VM that will be recreated next time I push a code change. If I am setting up a development environment for long term use, I will install my favorite IDE and configuring all the bells and whistles.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

the same old argument that anal sex is good because it works on more people

you might appreciate it, but being preinstalled is not the selling point you think it is. I spend hundreds of times longer in the editor than installing it. I want something good while I'm using it. I don't care if it takes me 30 seconds to install, and maybe no one should.

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

Most include micro iirc