How many Linux distros include micro in their minimal image? Vim, emacs, and nano are good because I can connect to just about any container or Linux VM and expect to have all of them available.

Let's say I have a test that always passes on my machine but fails in CI. If I can get a terminal on the test runner, I can open up my test code in vim, add extra logging and error handling, and rerun the test to check my fix.

I am not going to install additional editors in a VM that will be recreated next time I push a code change. If I am setting up a development environment for long term use, I will install my favorite IDE and configuring all the bells and whistles.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the same old argument that anal sex is good because it works on more people

you might appreciate it, but being preinstalled is not the selling point you think it is. I spend hundreds of times longer in the editor than installing it. I want something good while I'm using it. I don't care if it takes me 30 seconds to install, and maybe no one should.

[–] Dr_Del_Fuego@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago

Wow I love this argument, you're bang on 😆

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Most include micro iirc