T+5 Jahre: Bremen verbannt als letztes Bundesland KI-Chatbots aus Schulen
xtrapoletariat
joined 2 years ago
It's all about damn good coffee.
Apologies for being too cryptic/jargon. Pro tip: a real-life mentor can adapt to your level on-the-fly, if available.
Maybe this introduction helps a bit to get an overview - from the context I expect you are on JavaScript or related.
It's often hard to grasp why packages or techniques exist unless you ran into the problems that motivated the solution yourself.
In this case, it's all about filtering by the severity of log messages (debug level). If the level is high, your app will show tiny bits of information. These do not need to show for every user, except if they want to enable it (via techniques like a switch/flag, environment variable or a config file).
Config files or profiles are often used to enable/disable code parts in production or to configure how often scheduled jobs should be triggered and so on.
Depending on your level of expertise logging stuff via the console may be just fine for the moment. In particular if you are the sole developer. Once you're annoyed by your own logs, incrementally replace the 'prints' with a library that feels comfortable or well-documented.
The question mixes up tests and logging. You are referring to logs.
Use a good logging package. It will allow you to distinguish at least (possibly with verbosity levels)
- trace
- debug
- information
- warning
- error
In production, configure the log level to be info-level or above, everything below will be hidden.
Lower levels can be useful for debugging automated tests. Possibly via a flag in production as well.
I think they spelled anti-diversity disorder wrong.
Yes, and in fact, the complete jetbrains toolbox works fine on Linux. Setup is commonly done by simply unzipping an archive.
Remmina is nice to manage remote access, see https://remmina.org/
I heard negative criticism of rustdesk in terms of security, can anyone confirm or refute this?
Ah, great, I was not aware of that. I typically stick to the defaults, but this may help to convince others.
My impression is that LO criticism is unexpectedly harsh. After all, it's a free and powerful alternative to MO and you are in no way forced to use it.
It's less polished, obviously, but great for a wide range of use cases. Power users relying on specific features: different story.
For some reason I don't fully understand, LibreOffice hides the option to switch the UI in View > User Interface. The option Tabbed seems to resemble MS ribbon-like style.
They should possibly consider to make that a default question on first start-up, like: 'What interface layout feels familiar?'
view more: next ›
Da haben sie letztes Mal wohl nur den Strohwels erwischt... an die wahren Hinterwelse kommt man ja so gut wie nie ran.