wischi

Most sciences don't care about "truth" but care about models that predict the outcome of experiments. Even a model that works perfectly doesn't mean that this model is how the universe works. The universe could work completely different but the model happens to be very accurate anyway. Think about Newtowns laws of motion. They do not describe how the universe really works but the model is still pretty accurate and useful in many situations.

Even if we some day find a theory of everything, that still doesn't mean we know anything about the true nature of the universe. Just that everything we can observe is described by the model we developed.

every god

Tried to save and restart? Maybe the battery in the cartridge died?

Current LLMs are definitely not intelligent, but predicting the future is a big part (if not the most important part) of intelligence.

Your comment is a bit like saying that humans can't be intelligent, because the biochemistry in our brains is just laws of physics in motion, and the laws of physics are not intelligent.

Intelligent is an emergent property. You can definitely be intelligent even if every component is not.

But with LLMs we found a new weird "dimension" that something can be very knowledgeable without being intelligent. Even current LLMs have more general knowledge than all humans but they lack actual intelligence.

Feel free to use floppy disks. Btw if you are online, you use WebP and PNG all the time 🤣

Would completely defeat the purpose of making a new smaller file format if we prefix if with the old format.

Probably US-Americans confusing anything that's not predatory capitalism with Russia and China.

Nobody claimed that any sewing machine has PhD level intelligence in almost all topics.

LLMs are marketed as "replaces jobs", "PhD level intelligence", "Reasoning models", "Deep think".

And yet all that "PhD level intelligence" consistently gets the simplest things wrong.

But, prove me wrong. Pick a game, prompt any LLM you like and share it here (the whole conversation not only a code snippet)

Try to play tic tac toe against ChatGPT for example 🤣 (just ask for "let's play ASCII tic tac toe")

Practically loses every game against my 4yo child - if it even manages to play according to the rules.

AI: Trained on the entire internet using billions of dollars. 4yo: Just told her the rules of the game twice.

Currently the best LLMs are certainly very "knowledgeable" (as in, they "know" much more than I - or practically any person - do for most topics) but they are certainly far away from intelligence.

You should only use them of you are able to verify the correctness of the output yourself.

Just make tax exponential (so your netto is a log function of your brutto). Wouldn't have a hard "maximum" but effectively be impossible to have many times income of others (without paying unimaginable more taxes than everyone else). The hardest part is probably to handle "wealth" because that can be parked and "hidden" in so many different ways.

No

Only in the US 🤣