supamanc

joined 3 years ago
[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

And murcury is the closest planet to all of them!

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

That's his character though - annoying, but loyal loser struggling to make it Ina cruel world. It's what he does.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

And you can get pretty much any cusine in the world, at Michelin star quality, somewhere in the UK. What's your point?

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Jesus, the company quoted in that article, Ceaserstone, really suck balls. 'we're deeply disappointed by the decision to stop us killing young working men' 'we feel we should be allowed to kill just a few more, so that our profits don't suffer too much'

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Seems likely given the recent talk of removing Trump via the 25th(?) ammendment. Less likely if there's no VP (let's hope noone in the administration watched The West Wing!)

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Because 1) it's true and the article is a bit misleading as to whom is actually doing the lying and 2) it's important to remember that LLM are not sentient and to push back against the tide of language which subtly suggests they are.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The point is, the LLM is not 'lying' to you. It's showing you information. It doesn't 'know' whether the information is true or not. It also doesn't 'care'. Because it is a statistical model and is incapable of those things. And if you scroll back to my initial point, I said "technically, it's not lying, because lying requires intent to deceive, and LLMs don't have intent"

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

No, you are proving my point here. You say 'they' as in the publishers/owners/printers of the newspaper. You don't blame 'it' the literal, physical piece of paper you are holding in your hands.

In the same way that you would not say a clock was lying to you if it displays the wrong time.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

If a newspaper prints lies you don't say the physical piece of pulped up tree you are holding is lying to you, you say the author is.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

An LLM is a statistical modeling tool. It doesn't have goals. It can't have intentions. It just outputs according to an algorithm.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oooh, philosophy! I disagree. I think that if a person programs a LLM to give disinformation, that's all it is. A lie giving misinformation knowing that's it's disinformation, intending do deceive. The LLM doesn't know what's true or false. It doesn't intend anything, because it is not a conscious entity. The person who programmed it can be lying by disseminating false information, the LLM cannot, any more than a broken clock or thermometer is 'lying' about the time or temperature.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (19 children)

Not technically lies, as to lie there has to be an intent to deceive. LLMs don't have any intentions.

 

Who is making all of this content I'm seeing lately - tons of shorts and some full videos. Is it all AI? I know there was a short film made by amazon as part of their game World series, but what about the rest?

view more: next ›