stonerboner

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Replying and adding to the conversation are two very different things, friendo. Lmao

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Lmao okay reply guy!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Yes, you could play that game for many laws. One like this, specifically, could have helped Kyle face justice. That’s the point.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (8 children)

The key context is that this type of law in Wisconsin would have made it illegal for Kyle to not only purchase a firearm, but illegal to own/brandish/carry one.

Would it have stopped someone from illegally buying Kyle one or Kyle using it? No. But then he wouldn’t have gotten away with murder.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Pretty sure Kyle traveled without a firearm and had someone of-age purchase him one across state lines.

Here is an article about the guy who purchased him the gun, since Kyle couldn’t legally, taking a plea deal. https://abcnews.go.com/US/friend-bought-rifle-kyle-rittenhouse-plea-deal/story?id=82178053

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Lmao “far left extremism” is somehow contextually different than the phrase OP used (which btw is the context for this whole thread) than “extreme liberal?”

Laughably, you think your quibbling got you an out as far as providing proof of your claim. Please show me where Far Left Extremists™️ banned or burned books in any way near where Conservatives have. My proof is below, let’s see yours?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_banning_in_the_United_States_(2021–present)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Yep. I am fully convinced corporate studios don’t give a single shit about the players or game outside of how much money they think they can squeeze out of us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

I just sent my AM5 motherboard in to Asus for repair. They comped my shipping which was really nice. FYI, just request it and they’re happy to help.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Absolutely bonkers lmao

Of course imminent domain exists, silly. Yes, the government can force sales. Also squatters can be forcefully evicted through due process by the owner. That’s now what’s happening here. I can’t even begin to understand why it’s relevant.

Protecting the land means not letting it become part of the failed Wall, and not allowing building/dumping on it. As Elon has dumped his shit in their land, CaH is suing. Thats exactly what protecting the land is, buddy.

You seem to have a chub for Elon, or a chip against CaH. Not sure which, but you are waaaay off base lol

[–] [email protected] 63 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

Just buying land gives complete legal ownership and stewardship to the owner. They’re not obligated to do shit with it, and they bought it exactly so they could do nothing with it: keep it natural and pristine.

You seem to weirdly be invested in Cards Against Humanity being in the wrong, with the weird takes. They did exactly what they were expected to do- keep it pristine. What gives you any impression at all there were different expectations? Just flat out wrong.

Your whole comment reads like one of Musk’s alt accounts trying to rub defense lol. If you expressed any semblance of understanding why and how CAH acquired the land before you began with “this isn’t the first time they failed expectations, why didn’t they build anything?!,” maybe you’d get better replies

view more: ‹ prev next ›