slackassassin

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

This is not true. You can get an id card that is not a drivers license.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Too true, and my problem is about to be your problem and the cycle continues comrade.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What law are you taking about?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

DON'T THINK THAT JUST BECAUSE I'M PEACEFUL THAT I FORGOT HOW TO CRANK MY HOG

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

I'm not religious, but it was cringe because they were reveling in thier ignorance right before paroting common online reductions of faith. "Obey your sky daddy's rules" and all that. Seems trite. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I wish I could sleep however much I want or need. That sounds lovely.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I want to figure out how stupid this is, but there are no equations in all of the high level math and physics I perform regularly and flawlessly to calculate the amount of stupid in this.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Starting wars, especially world wars, is bad. I don't know what else to tell you.

Other than individual countries can take action if they decide to.

Perhaps you could drum up popular support amongst your citizenry and convince them to start a war.

Certainly been done before, you'd be in good company.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

You are advocating for a group of countries party to a defensive pact, going on the offensive, to perform a preemptive strike on a nuclear armed country. And arguing that the alternative could be ww3.

That is the same as saying starting ww3 is the only way to avoid ww3.

Might be time to end Nato

Increasingly less interestingly enough, also a Kremlin talking point.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (6 children)

You're missing the point. It's not a strategical decision that's being made here.

NATO is a defense treaty, not a warfare alliance. It has specific language describing it as such.

Interestingly enough, you are paroting Kremlin talking points by treating it as anything other than a defensive agreement.

 
view more: next ›