sfu

That is the goal. But, he is also targeting countries that already put tariffs on things we ship to them. So, its also to try and put an end to that.

I get it, I don't think a national standard is a bad thing. I think more people would be fine with the DOE if public schools didn't teach kids to think politically this way or that about current societal issues. Teaching politics is fine, but children are more easily manipulated. Basically keep current politics out of school because children aren't wise enough at that age to handle it. But, that is why those who want to make changes always go after kids. I think a lot of people feel the DOE has been involved in doing this.

Many of them I see have video cameras next to them. And most I've encountered have a separate video screen above the touch screen. You know, that way you don't have to miss your favorite ads while you fiddle with your card and put into your info and select if you want a receipt and if you want a carwash to go with your ad.

Just 200 in one night is a lot, I would think there'd be some carelessness leading to getting caught. Did most of the gas stations fix them and continue showing ads? Just curious.

everyone acting like he wants to deport everyone who disagrees with him, as if that's what was said even though it wasn't

Honestly, according the video in the article, all she said Trump has talked about was the possibility of deporting repeat violent criminals. What I don't get, is why do you have to deport them? Can't you just keep them in prison?

Doesn't matter if you are right or if you are wrong. A good, honest study includes all participants, and everything medically that happened to them.

I don't want to be injected with something unless I agree to it. That is not unreasonable. To forcibly inject people with drugs / vaccines against their will is assault.

I mentioned before (maybe not to you), when Pfizer was doing trials of the covid19 vac, there were a number of people who died. Pfizer did not include them in the results. That is an example of a study that included lies.

I have a family member with many medical issues, and I read a lot of studies on various treatments for different issues. I've had doctors flat out lie to our faces about a drugs effectiveness, and after telling then what we know about it, they agree with us and say they think we should use it anyway. Basically admitting they weren't being honest with us about the drug.

Some drugs have been studied in other countries other than my own, and have been shown to be 100% ineffective as a treatment for a particular condition. But the insurance company and doctors still push it, and when confronted with the studies, say that those studies aren't recognized here because they weren't conducted in my country.

I say "if", because a person can be pro vaccine, but have an issue with one in particular after researching it.

No it's not a strawman. This happened with the covid-19 vacs. Sure it wasn't purple, but I wasn't specifically talking about that vac.

Correct, you would do your research. And if you did your research and came to the conclusion that a particular vaccine (not thinking of any in particular) was not safe for a child to take, would you be a good parent if you did it anyway just because a lot of other people are?

Ok, I just disagree. I'm not pro or anti vaccine, I just think people shouldn't be forced to take drugs if they don't feel safe doing so.

Yes, and not the insurance companies.