psycholocomotor

joined 5 days ago
[–] psycholocomotor@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm new to Lemmy I don't know how stuff works.

There it's enclosed in the spoiler now and not cluttering up the comments.

[–] psycholocomotor@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Darwin is a terrible example because biologists didn't throw out Darwin did they? I guess general relativity is a bunk theory and nobody should read about it, because now we know it's probably only a low energy limit of some kind of 11 dimesional superstring theory.

Here:

Capitalist Realism by Mark Fisher written in 2009.

Women, Race and Class written by Angela Davis in 1981. (This one is a really good analysis of slavery in America.)

Soledad Brother: The Prison Letters of George Jackson was written in 1970. (I haven't read this one, but it's on my list. It definitely is still relevant: the horrific oppression of black people by the US carceral system is still ongoing and you can make comparisons to the treatment of immigrants.)

[–] psycholocomotor@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Kwame Nkrumah wrote Neo-Colonialism, The Last Stage of Imperialism in 1965 exactly coinciding with the release of the first ever desktop computer, the P101.

[–] psycholocomotor@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (4 children)
[–] psycholocomotor@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

why are trains catching strays? I love trains.

[–] psycholocomotor@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (7 children)

Have you read the books? You should really read the books. It certainly can't hurt.

5
submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) by psycholocomotor@lemmy.world to c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

explanation(Also in the replies to one of the comments)

In Capital volume two there's a section on the expanded form of capitalist reproduction and the simple form of capitalist reproduction. It's basically how the capitalist system reproduces itself so it continues after a production cycle. It's an analysis of the entire system, instead of just capital in isolation.

The entire economy can be abstracted into two departments.

Department I is the production of the means of production: all of the factories and private enterprises, etc. owned by capitalists that produce the means of production. The means of production are commodities like industrial machinery, mining equipment, smelters, tools, electrical infrastructure, chemical intermediates, Dow Chemical teflon coating, dyes, iron gear wheels, basic circuits, etc. Consumers don't buy this stuff (unless they're nerds), companies do.

Department II is the production of the means of consumption and the production of commodities for consumption: Coca Cola, Nestlé, Chiquita bananas, all of the companies you see in grocery stores, pharmaceuticals, coffee, personal use vehicles, personal computers, smartphones, fast food restaurants, avocados, diamond rings, private jets, etc. Department II is what consumers actually buy.

The value in departments one and two can both be expressed by:

c + v + s

c is constant capital, which is portion of capital that doesn't grow, it's value of the ingredients and the cost of maintaining the equipment that processes those ingredients.

v is variable capital, which is the same as "the total wages paid to workers." It's variable because it's the portion of capital that actually grows, because labor-power is the only commodity that creates more value than its cost to purchase (wages).

s is the surplus value. Surplus value is the value produced by workers beyond what is needed to reproduce their labor-power. It's the value produced during the unpaid part of the working day that capitalists are able to extract from workers because they own the means of production. It's the profit.

Constant capital (c ) and labor-power (v) are being bought by capitalists to be turned into new commodities with surplus value (s) added to its value when it's created (c + v + s). The new commodity is then sold for money and the money is used to pay wages and buy new constant capital for the next cycle of production.

Departments one and two must be balanced, because if they aren't, then capitalists will find out that they can't sell their goods because there's not enough buyers (crisis of overproduction).

The first example of the meme is the simple form of reproduction. The simple form of reproduction is when the surplus value generated by the production process isn't re-invested into expanding the production process and is entirely consumed by capitalists.

s = s~c~ + Δc + Δv

s~c~ is the portion of surplus value consumed by capitalists.

Δc is the portion of surplus value being used to buy additional constant capital, beyond just replacing the original, and Δv is the portion going to buy additional labor to expand a company's workforce.

In simple reproduction s=s~c~ and Δc and Δv both equal zero. So in the first example the capitalists are spending all of their profit on like gold steaks, or ballrooms, or sculptures of balloon animals, or whatever.

For it to balance Department I must replace its own constant capital, so... c~1~ + v~1~ + s~1~ - c~1~ = v~1~ + s~1~

This is like the stuff that goes into producing the stuff that produces the means of production.

Department II must produce the means of subsistence for its own workers and in this scenario, its capitalists are spending all of their profit on each others Dept.II companies... so c~2~ + v~2~ + s~2~ - v~2~ - s~2~ = c~2~ = c~2~ All that's left is c~2~ and Department II must buy this constant capital from Department I.

And Department I must also produce the constant capital used by Department II, so...

v~1~ + s~1~ (the remaining value in Dept.I after it has renewed its own constant capital) must equal c~2~ (the constant capital that Dept.II requires).

v~1~ + s~1~ = c~2~ (The balanced equation for simple reproduction.)

This is stable, but we rarely see situations like this in reality.

In expanded reproduction there are the same two equations for the value of both departments:

(Dept.I) c~1~ + v~1~ + s~1~

(Dept.II) c~2~ + v~2~ + s~2~

I already gave an explanation for what those variables mean so I'll skip over to the different bits.

In expanded reproduction s != s~c~ and Δc and Δv for both departments are non-zero (in real life the vast majority of profit gets re-invested as there's just no way the bourgeoisie can spend billions on consumer goods every year, nobody could ever use that much money). s = s~c~ + Δc + Δv so substitute it in where s was.

The full equations look like this now:

(Dept.I) c~1~ + v~1~ + (s~c1~ + Δc~1~ + Δv~1~)

(Dept.II) c~2~ + v~2~ + (s~c2~ + Δc~2~ + Δv~2~)

To balance them now we require that Department I renew its constant capital, so you just substract c~1~, but it also must renew its newly bought constant capital, so substract Δc~1~ too:

(Dept.I) v~1~ + s~c1~ + Δv~1~ (The value left that is able to circulate out of Dept.I)

Do the side but since Department II produces its own labor-power it's s~c2~, v~2~, and Δv~2~ that cancels so it gives you:

(Dept.II) c~2~ + Δc~2~ (Constant capital needs to be bought from Dept.I)

This must be able to renew Department II's constant capital (and newly bought constant capital) so the balanced form of expanded reproduction is...

(Dept.I) v~1~ + s~c1~ + Δv~1~ = c~2~ + Δc~2~ (Dept.II)

However, as you can probably see, this requires the growth of Department I to be in lockstep with the growth of Department II or else commodities are being created that nobody can actually afford. Capitalism has no way of balancing these departments, they act independently out of self-interest.

Department I can buy from itself like a feedback loop and then realize its in trouble once its producing too much for Department II to feasibly buy, but the capitalists can't stop themselves, because once the crisis hits, if they didn't grow then they'll go under! This can only be resolved by Department II growing beyond capacity as well, or by sections of Department I going bankrupt.

Department II are all competing for the consumer's attention, all at once. And all of those companies are trying to grow, all at once, but the total wages of workers plus the amount spent by capitalists can't consume all of it.

Almost always:

(Dept.I) v~1~ + s~c1~ + Δv~1~ ≠ c~2~ + Δc~2~ (Dept.II)

So there are cyclical crises overproduction where huge swathes of capital that has over-accumulated devalues or is destroyed, and afterwards there is usually even more inequality, and the economy is more monopolized and more financialized, so the next crisis will be even bigger.

[–] psycholocomotor@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

well, damn, at least my hypothetical stocks in Nvidia will provide a return! /j

[–] psycholocomotor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

People who own capital on an international scale vs. People who own a small amount vs. People who own none.

[–] psycholocomotor@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The goal of majority of democratic socialists in America is to redistribute imperial super profits to the American working class (excluding immigrants and other oppressed groups the DSA can conveniently ignore). Their billionaires certainly didn't get that rich from taking all that money from Americans.

 

I timed it. Most of that time is waiting for a transfer, yes, but getting there by car takes about 20 minutes...

There has been more than one time, where it has been raining when I got on the first bus, and then not raining anymore when I got off the second.

There's no benches where you transfer buses and it's supposed to be the bus center for the city. It's an island of curb in the middle of a huge mall parking-lot. You stand there or sit on the curb for like forty minutes sometimes.

You can actually see the swirls of the wind in the plastic wrapper garbage that blows by. The area is like semi enclosed by big box stores so my theory is that it like accumulates the airborne garbage somehow.

Another reason why it takes so long is that the first stop which is by my neighborhood...

(For context my neighborhood is like an isolated suburb off of a four lane highway...)

(Except it's a not really a highway and there are houses with driveways connected to it. I guess it's more like an arterial road of the city or something, but if I'm remembering correctly, it doesn't merge with a highway, it becomes one.)

You can't get off on the first stop because it's on the other side of the highway / street / road. It's impossible to cross. There's just no way.

What you have to do to not get stranded when you get off the second bus, is wait until the route cycles through all the stops in the outskirts of the city, and then get off at that stop when it's coming the other way, on the other side of the road.

There is no bus sign, just an indent in the sidewalk wide enough and long enough for a vehicle to park. There are no benches.

Then I walk for around 2 minutes (that I'm not counting) through the suburbs to get to my house.

view more: next ›