onlinepersona

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the idea boils down to either outside instances aggregating votes made on their side and sending final voting result on a scale -1/0/1 or alternatively this aggregation could be done by the hosting community

Could you provide an example calculation? I'm not getting it. Do you want to map values from one range to another e.g [-1000,1000] to [-1,1]? Will each instance have its own mapping?

Also, computationally, I'm not sure how this is going to work iteratively. From what I understand, activitypub sends events either singular or batched to other servers e.g User X votes up, that's an event sent, User Y votes down, that's another event sent. If I'm not mistaken, lemmy doesn't store the events it receives so reconstituting a vote tally isn't possible.

I kinda get where you're coming from, but I'm not sure it's the right solution.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean that I don't know of an opensource game store, let alone one that allows devs to get paid. There are stores out there where devs publish their opensource games, but the stores themselves are proprietary.

I'm not sure how an opensource game store could be monetized. It would probably be donations. A part of those could go to the game store devs. Probably the closest we'll get to something like that is the Heroic Launcher. If they added an index of opensource games and had a distribution package (I assume it would be flatpak) and some method of payment or donation link, it could be possible.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

It's much more fun to play collaborative games vs AI with a higher level friend than playing competitive games vs humans with a higher level friend. You always get destroyed in the latter for weeks while your frustrated friend tries to coach you.

Not even once.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I look forward to opensource games on an opensource game store that allows devs to get paid. That would be amazing.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Goddammit, that's a good one 🤣

Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What am I missing? What's wrong with zip? Should tar.gz be used instead?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I wish they actually for serious about it and said "@[email protected] is aiming to be 100% opensource by 2030". That would be quite the statement. It would need teeth/legs, but it would be cool none the less.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Post it on the fediverse. TikTok isn't the only platform out there. And if you think TikTok is a necessary evil, you're part of the problem.

Anti Commercial-AI license

 

I've tried watching videos about it, but they are not analysing the reasons. Instead it's just whining about the symptoms and hypocrisy of rich CEOs firing employees then buying a yacht. We all know it's terrible, but my question is "why". "herp derp, capitalism" and "omg, it's the fucking CEOs" doesn't explain anything.

 

I don't have a Github account after deleting it some time after it was ought by Microsoft. Given the rise of anti-US sentiment and calls to stop using their products, more people leaving Github might be a real occurrence. How can I and others who have left, are leaving, and will leave Github, be able to contribute?

 

As of 2025-03-02, the matrix foundation has not released a single financial report despite being a non-profit.

 

We don't want to deal with the administration required to properly handle donations. If we don't need funding, we won't risk becoming dependent on it. And also: no donations means no expectations. This means that people working on LibreWolf are free to move on to other projects whenever they want.

18
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Basically, I'd like to have my own domain e.g [email protected] but not go through the hassle of hosting my own email service: I'd like to use another service that handled SPF, DMARC, and whatever else for me, grab the emails from their service using POP, and make it available to my email client on android and Linux using IMAP. SMTP will be through the third party.

This way, if the third party starts doing some bullshit like trying to lock me in, donating to a dickhead, or whatever else I disagree with, I can cancel my subscription, move to another third party, and keep all mails on my server.

How can I achieve this? Which search terms should I be using? "Self host email server" brings up stuff that's the equivalent of self-hosting gmail, AOL, posteo, kollabnow, or whatever, but that's not what I want. "Selfhost POP relay" doesn't have much better results, always bringing up SMTP relay...

 

I think it's obvious (and has been) that the linux kernel needs more contributors and more maintainers to share the load*. The Linux Foundation spending 2% on kernel development in 2024 (page 18) does something but not nearly enough.

Is there a way that we as a community / third parties / non kernel devs can fund kernel developers and maybe even get a kernel maintainer in there? Maybe something already exists or do we have to start something ourselves?

*: Yes, I understand our overworked maintainer problem (being one of these people myself), but here we have people actually doing the work! - Greg KH

25
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I've got 64 GB of RAM and would like to force cargo to dump build artifacts into it. So basically the target/ directory should end up there.

Unless I'm mistaken RAM is much faster than SSDs and since I do rebuild quite often, it would save some R/W cycles on my SSD and allow faster file access.

I do jot mind doing a full rebuild every morning

Solution:

These 2 comments gave me the best indication how to do it: cargo ramdisk and build.target-dir config options.

Would be great if cargo had a build.target-dir-prefix though. One could set and env var CARGO_TARGET_DIR_PREFIX and point it at /dev/shm or /tmp if it's a tmpfs and every rust project would have its artefacts end up in RAM.

11
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

How do admins feel about users requesting (or creating) communities on here for blogging purposes? For example /c/online persona or /c/online persona sibling or something similar.

I saw somebody talking about how they started doing that on another server and simply linking to it on reddit to get traction in the fediverse. It seems like a great idea to me. Blogs are shared quite often and them being on Lemmy allows for new entries to simply show up in the local feed. They can be easily crossposted and commented on in Lemmy and across the fediverse if I'm not mistaken.

The only problem I could see is are naming conflicts. For example if somebody reads this and immediately creates /c/onlinepersona to block me from creating that to force a report to the admins. Or the reverse, a user creating the name "programming-guides" to then claim a community with the same name.

Thoughts?

Anti Commercial-AI license

 

Every week or so there seems to be drama about some old dude shouting about how rust in the Linux kernel is bad. Given all the open hostility, is there easier way for R4L to continue their work?

 

I know little about gradle and have only just started exploring it, so this is just a question out of curiosity.

It's supposedly a language agnostic dependency manager and builder, yet it seems to have only found its niche in Java. C/C++ projects could definitely do with dependency resolution...

 

I've inherited a systemd service and it uses BindReadOnlyPaths to make certain paths available to the service (doc)

A bind mount makes a particular file or directory available at an additional place in the unit's view of the file system. Any bind mounts created with this option are specific to the unit, and are not visible in the host's mount table.

The service is running using a specific user and I would like the user to access those read-only paths outside of the service. Is there an possibility within systemd that would allow me to do that?

Edit: solved it with a systemd bind mount

view more: ‹ prev next ›