ofcourse

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Until Republican lawmakers change their voting patterns, these articles mean nothing and IMO are poor journalism. Lawmakers can say anything about their reelection worries and polls almost always show swings in the opposite direction after elections.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The human elements are being stripped away along with consumer protections. So services are becoming more and more like the tech sector (like YouTube, WhatsApp blocking) where for a long time, the situation has been that decisions get made by an algorithm and there is literally no one to appeal to about them.

Take banking as an example - with brick and mortar locations shrinking, it’s already so hard to get simple things done unless you download their app, agree to an unnecessarily long list of terms and conditions which can be changed unilaterally at any time, and your rights to sue are waived in favor of arbitration.

We as consumers are doing more of the work that was previously being done by employees and without getting paid for it. Think self checkouts - when it started, I was very happy that I didn’t have to talk to a person if I didn’t feel like it, but now I am essentially forced to use it because there are few to no cashiers. And I’m not getting paid to do the work for which an employee was previously getting paid, nor am I paying less for my groceries as a result of doing the work myself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t buy the smaller platforms being hurt more argument.

It’s not hard to prevent undue burden on smaller platforms by adding in the bill that it only applies to platforms with more than $1B in revenue.

We need to get rid of 230 because it has given way too much immunity to the biggest internet companies and they have been simply shrugging away all their responsibilities. Let’s work out how to make this bill work for the people instead of shutting it out.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Democratic Party’s sole strategy looks like maximizing their big donor and independent votes. So they keep moving toward center-right.

  1. That strategy has failed 2/3 last times so may be try changing it Sherlock.
  2. The big donors don’t care about anything besides their own personal gain. The only difference is that “Democratic” big donors also pretend they care about the people. May be get on the ground and talk to your constituents instead.
  3. Even if you get the independent votes, your main base is completely alienated and does not trust you. So all you will get are the independent votes losing you the election.

This Democratic Party is like the monsters in Scooby Doo - the villain wearing the mask of the common person so they can get closer to you before stabbing in the back.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Why is Bhutan one of the most weird countries? Oh, WIRED.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

After seeing all the things that Orange is doing both in his first and new terms, Biden’s term feels like a lame Presidency with just complaints about how Republicans wouldn’t allow him to accomplish his agenda. His entire spiel during the election was to save America from another fascist president, and he did the complete opposite by giving away the country to a herd of fascists. History will remember him as the enabling President for fascism.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Recent recessions have shown that the top 1% get richer after the recession. It makes sense when you think about the super rich having the cash to invest is now much cheaper stocks and property while everyone else is struggling to make ends meet.

So I wonder how much the Nazi and the monkey want to avoid a recession. The monkey does not have to worry about reelection and the Nazi is a psychopath.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Up until a couple of weeks ago, Canada was well on its path to elect a right leaning government. Trudeau has already resigned and his party was in the gutters. So that tells you how majority of Canadians have been feeling. There is extreme false-facts-driven anti-immigrant sentiment going around, imo, propagated by the same media that is doing so in the US.

Luckily, Nazi musk and his orange monkey’s moves have taken off the veil for some Canadians so there is still some hope for sanity prevailing in their upcoming elections.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (21 children)

The fact that Democrats should be raising their voices as loudly as possible against this admin’s moves but instead a sizable 10 of them voted to censure the 1 Democrat who tried to in fact do that, tells you everything about the Democrats’ plans.

At this point, there are only a handful of them who are rallying their constituents and speaking out about this admin’s atrocities, but the majority is completely MIA. Then they wonder why their voters are MIA during the elections.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 4 weeks ago (28 children)

The era of US-Canada being brothers in arms is over. I doubt US will be receiving any favors in the future without something in return. And if Canada chooses to expand their supply chains outside of the US, which they 100% should, there’ll be no coming back to a scale of trade as it exists today.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Athletes have always leveraged unfair advantages in sports. There’s a reason there’s super tall players in basketball and short ones in gymnastics. May be they should enforce that average height of teams must match global averages. Countries with fewer resources just can’t support athletes in many sports so why not make that more fair?

There’s research showing that some women athletes (i.e., born with female reproductive organs) have higher testosterone levels than many men, and even some male athletes. So why are they allowed to compete in women sports instead of men?

There’s a lot of ways to make sports more fair. Banning transgender people without fair science based facts is not one of them and is plain bigotry. It’s like saying an athlete on anti-depressants should be banned because they are happier and more motivated so have an unfair advantage.

10
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Current Behavior

  • there is a Hide Read posts button

  • there is an option to Mark Read on Scroll

  • there is a Gesture to Hide

  • There is an option to Reset Hidden posts

Issue

  1. When some GIF/video posts take time to fully load in the , I would scroll down to next set of posts while I wait for previous videos to load. As a result, I cannot turn on Mark Read on Scroll because the slow loading posts have not been Read. 

  2. Upvoting/Downvoting marks posts as Read

  3. If I want to hide some posts, I use the Gesture to Hide posts.  

  4. If I hide a post by mistake, using the Reset Hidden Posts option deletes the history of Hidden posts but keeps the history of Read posts. 

  5. After reading the incorrectly hidden post, if I Hide Read Posts again, only the Read posts are hidden. The previously Hidden posts have been reset are not hidden at this point.

  6. As a result, in order to retrieve one post marked hidden by mistake, we end up unhiding all the other Hidden posts. 

Solution

Provide a Gesture to Mark Posts as Read

  • This gesture can then be used instead of the Gesture to Hide posts. 

  • When Resetting Hidden Posts, the history of Read posts will be preserved. 

  • When using the button to Hide Read posts again, all Read posts will be correctly hidden instead of losing the Hidden posts history. 

  • Alternative Solution**

Provide an option to Mark Hidden Posts as Read

Finally, thank you so much for consistently providing the most amazing Lemmy browsing experience!

view more: next ›