Damn. All this talk of conservatives being throat goats and we completely forgot how much Warren likes head.
nagaram
I want to believe we could have a woman president so long as she ran on something other than being a wet noodle that's trying to be #relatable more than just being a good candidate.
Or better yet, running on something more than
"Are you really gonna let Trump win?"
For me it was that I have a very open and casual relationship with enjoying human bodies. Yeah I think its beautiful, yeah it makes me a little horny, no I'm not ashamed that I'm attracted to and supportive of tasteful nudity on the internet.
But the honest answer is that most men are lazy and a bit crass.
Do it
This is certainly interesting as fuck
So you're a god in a 40,000 person polycule?
And its one sided so they don't even fuck each other. But this one taken person was the only one you wanted to breed with?
Honestly, pretty convincing god lore
https://web.archive.org/web/20220204164530/https://www.headstamppublishing.com/foreigner-group
There's only archives of this page says reddit
I wouldn't be surprised if the guy did publish it under a pen name and different title.
Dude it was me who got confused LMAO
While we were having this back and forth I was also talking in another thread about wanting to read more Cuban history.
Let me find the actual controversy book.
Oh same honestly. I think he ultimately did the right thing with the publishing issue. He also made the correct business move sorta staying out of it when Karl Kasarda was having a spat with Browning and the ar15.com forum.
Ian's dome a pretty good job being a neutral observer and has course corrected both times he's started to swerve.
Yeah I don't think that's the guy who was imbedded with the Azov battalion during the Ukrainian civil uprising in the early 2010s
That's also not Ian McCallum.
But that is the guy I recommended earlier in a different thread.
Are you confused or am I?
Google turns up nothing. You're gonna have to link it if true.
Also this was a controversy from 3-4 years ago. I'm willing to let the man grow. Unfortunately this very thread starting with him working with Brandon "Don't simp for communists" Herrera.
So there's also that.
"Cuba Since the revolution of 1959: a critical assessment" by Samuel Farber
I have not read this book yet and only have it because I was in Haymarkets book club for a while. So I can't attest to the quality other than I generally trust Haymarket.
I do think there's a debate to be had as to if were in a "better place" then if Clinton had won
If she had won, we wouldn't be better off relative to 2015. We would have been in the same shit we were in 10 years ago with a housing crisis on the rise and COVID would have still happened and probably wouldn't have gone too radically differently.
Wed still have increased income inequality and we saw under Biden that the main Liberal answer to climate change is Electric Cars which net doesn't help and in fact worsens our e-waste issue.
Obviously, I don't know this is how it would have gone for sure, but the democrats really haven't given me much to believe in.
So would we have been "better off" with a dem successor compared to the 2015 status quo? No I don't think so and I think we all knew that and it doesn't inspire people to vote or participate in elections.
Would we have been better off to what we got? Yeah probably. But that's stuff we didn't completely know until hindsight kicked in. I think we all assumed he'd be a lame president and not a modern Commodus or Nero.
Now, I don't subscribe to acceleration ist views, but there is that view point as well.
Under that ideology, we are better off compared to a Clinton or Harris win because they would have subdued the flakier radical elements in society longer.
Trump being president and his flagrant disregard for our status quo system is a massive stepping stone towards a revolution of some sort to hopefully fix the problems of our 2015 society plus the additional inflated issues by Trump.