mke

Nooo... I haven't finished it yet, I thought I'd be able to do so on Linux :'^(

We're only talking about the original at least, right?

's what happens when one tires of getting surprise racism in hobby-talk.

Does programming count as a hobby? I waste my free time on it... There's this funny stereotype, of a queer programmer with long, quirky socks, and maybe even a fursona. Despite being a small percentage, such types are often overrepresented online. It used to bother me a little.

Nowadays I'm so, so glad when someone I'm talking to is part of that group. It usually means I don't need to worry about them being weirdly sexist, like women don't suffer enough in STEM already, or insisting that we need to keep politics out of tech (i.e. they want their politics to rule, unquestioned).

(Need something more tangible? Look no further than uncle bob (skip to the bottom). I've seen his books in classrooms, in the office, and let's not speak of online mentions. This is a relatively well-known, respected name in the industry. If you get to know people, you will meet many, many uncle bobs out there.)

Silly feelings on my part? Perhaps. One less thing to worry about, though.

No need to apologize, I'll take a late reply over nothing any day. I'm not the fastest replier, myself. That said, I'm sorry, but isn't that the guy that calls everyone stupid, delusional, and entitled when people (often) point out his mistakes?

I honestly appreciate the comment from a Firefox dev, believing in good faith that it's truthful—such insights are often hidden, strewn over comments, old IRC messages, etc.—but I'm definitely wary of taking anything that creator says at face-value. Tech-influencers may have been a mistake.

...Well, I'll give it a shot anyway, since you say there's value in it. Thank you.

That's a bad vibe if I've ever seen one.

Seeing that you replied to a comment that's almost a week old, I wouldn't be surprised if you do.

I really hope no one reading thinks this redditor behavior is as cool as the author does. Dude seemingly can't get the point they're arguing against, so this is all that's left, I guess.

Yeah buddy, this is to sleep better at night. You've shown you're not stopping the high-school tier debate club logic and the goofy-ass mic-drops.

Sure, ignore him being pals with the homophobe CEO and welcoming Mr. genocide because he made cool tech. Because being a developer puts you above mere ethical issues, and saying "I'm apolitical" makes you immune to criticism.

And lets ignore that it's been changed since. People 'never' change, so lets fuck up their entire career and public image for life.

Andreas hasn't changed, that's half the point of my comment. The PR was sent by someone else, merged by someone else, disguised with a different title, and all after his departure announcement. Someone approached him about it later, and Andreas himself admits he hasn't changed his mind. Did you read nothing? Where's this change you're so confident about?

And I'm not ruining his career, that's absurd. I couldn't manage, even if I wanted to. Look at the niche forum we're in. Even so, I've defended his work, his skill, the very idea of Ladybird, the need for more browser engines, even the tooling. But unless people shut up and never criticize him, it's just not enough for you.

If you think that comment outweighs all the positive impacts Andreas is making, that's your prerogative. I'm not interested in holding everyone up to such high expectations.

"Don't unnecessarily chum up to homophobes and genocide defenders" aren't high expectations. They're ridiculously low-hanging fruit, considering our history. Absolutely pathetic excusing of his actions.

I think voters started being counted a while back? I'll see if I can find the release notes.

Edit: there we go, from the docs.

An active user is someone who has posted, commented, or voted on our instance or community within the last given time frame.

Can't believe I forgot about it, already starred and waiting to see where it goes. Thanks.

I think the biggest difference is the fact Google owns the majority of the web browser market share, but there's more to the cases than "big company owns big browser," it actually has to do with Google's search engine deals (e.g. with Apple and Mozilla) and Google's ad business stifling the industry.

Oh, it absolutely is, sorry if it felt like I was challenging that. It's just a reminder to temper our hopes.

It's a little complicated, but it doesn't look good. If you're interested, I wrote a comment about it.