mathemachristian

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

they're controlled opposition. they never learn sadly, but at least there was a ceasefire and some aid got in

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

how dare you Im not an engineer

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

a great summary of "wage of labor and capital"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I'm saying it's a bs reason and it has everything to do with the west palestinian occupation regime

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

there is worry it's about centralization around lemmy.world

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It pulled a documentary where the producers had failed to disclose the narrator’s personal connection to Hamas

and how is that relevant?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

his dad being a fervent nazi certainly didn't help

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why can't I post my jokes about jews in this community called nazijokes??? Where's the freeze peach??

I know it's nazi stuff but still got a chuckle from it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

congrats you're ready for the next step: a declarative package configuration like (non-)guix or nixos

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When you sell your home, you won’t get back any of the money you gave to the bank as interest, but in theory everything else including your down payment will be returned to you.

and your partner would get nothing if she "bolted" even though she paid money so you could have it

I mean when you’re renting a place you’re more than likely helping the owner pay off their loan anyway. It’s just another step removed.

and you think thats fair??? "It's a bit like I'm the landlord and my partner is the tenant" is the argument I'm trying to make

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

well to me it doesn't seem fair for the non-owner to help pay off the house and the other getting to own all of it.

The price for owning that house is not just the loan but the interest as well. A home is more than a financial investment, but a necessity. Imagine buying a car that you let your SO use but insisting that she pay a quarter of the cost because the car loses half its value as soon as you drive it off the lot and it's only fair that she pay half of that money thats "lost" but then keeping all the money once you sell the car to yourself

view more: next ›