lennivelkant
What about Black Hole by Betraying The Martyrs?
If I'd managed to stick a robot landing on a rock hurtling through space, you bet I'd be celebrating hard too
So what's wrong with cumming the backstreet
Solid vitamin C is relatively stable, but it decomposes rather quickly when dissolved in water. Factors such as pH, temperature, oxygen, and the presence of catalysts (iron, copper) influence the decomposition process. The lowest rate of oxidation is observed at pH 3, where vitamin C solutions are the most stable. Raising the pH to 5 increases the oxidation rate by a factor of 2.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3510389/
The study uses particularly clean water (clean enough to be suitable for medical injections) with a pH of ~7.4. At that acidity and a temperature of 20°C (≈70°F), it takes about 95 days for the vitamin C to decay to 10% of its original concentration, or 28 days to reach 50%.
Normal drinking water has a pH of 6.5-8.5, but also contains a lot of other substances, which might increase the rate of oxidation. Given the potential time between treatment and consumption as well as the fact that people might boil it and increase the rate of decay that way, it's just not as economical to add ascorbic acid to the water supply if only a small percentage of it will ever reach the consumers.
Additionally, the exact dosage will be hard to control, leading to a risk of excessive side effects such as kidney stones. People with a specific enzyme deficiency may also suffer anemia as excessive doses.
Compare that to, say, lemons, whose juice has a pH of ~ 2.4 and renders the vitamin a lot more stable. If you want people to get a good intake of vitamin C, tell them to eat fruits and vegetables, preferably uncooked. The vitamin C dosage you'll get from that will hardly lead to megadoses, unless you eat such vast amounts that you'd probably get other problems anyway.
The reason fluoride is added is that it's quite stable, safe and effective, while also being fairly cheap.
Did George Lucas know that?
I don't know. There is a certain tendency in western media to overrepresent the significance of swords in pre-gunpowder combat (at least when they're not treating bows like they're guns and catapults like artillery).
On the other hand, with well-made swords often serving as a status symbol (due to being more expensive in terms of required material, labour and skill of the craftsman) it makes sense for the Jedi to wield them as a symbol of affiliation and the reputation that accompanies that affiliation. Everyone can buy a Blaster, but a Lightsaber?
Or maybe he just wanted to emphasize the mysticism around katanas.
It doesn't have to be either/or, I think both are plausible.
The amount of times I've gone "Oh wait, wasn't there an ACOUP post touching on that?" and found it is insane. It's a great exemplar of public science and I wish it – and projects like it for other disciplines – were more popular.
There’s plenty of one handed lightsaber usage.
The only one that I'm aware of that uses them exclusively one-handed is Dooku, and he's a bit of a special case. Otherwise, the cases I'm aware of switch between one- and two-handed strikes, which means they'd want their offhand free.
Ashoka famously dual wields.
Hence my point: Space Wizards can do that, but that still means there's no offhand free for a blaster.
I think it more like how some samurai considered firearms dishonorable.
Samurai did use bows and other weapons beside their sword, so it's not that they strictly adhere to one weapon like the Jedi seem to, but yes, Obi-Wan does describe it as "uncivilised", so that is an element as well.
Since you brought up the analogy, I'll point out that the Samurai diminished in power and importance as firearms spread, coming to a head with the Satsuma Rebellion that ended with their whole class being disbanded. To a degree, the Jedi being shot down by the newly formed professional army at the behest of the Emperor very much mirrors... well, the Japanese Imperial Army shooting down the Samurai that opposed the reforms (except the Jedi weren't even given the chance to oppose and rebel, which probably would have gone quite differently).
Well, considering that a slave could run upwards of 2,000HS, that difference is negligible. I wouldn't have known it by memory at all.
Not that I know of, but damn if I don't want that to be a thing now.
Grain seems to have run anywhere from 2-3HS per modius (a Roman dry measure, about 6.75kg) outside of really big cities with higher prices. A modius of grain is close to a week’s worth of food (around 22,500 calories) for an adult human[.]
https://acoup.blog/2025/01/03/collections-coinage-and-the-tyranny-of-fantasy-gold/
(But I agree that a slave for the price of a week's food would be gone in a blink)
I would argue that the Empire as an imperialist hegemon started with their conquests that formed a hegemony, which I'd place around 340 BCE. The Principate replaced the Republic in 27 BCE with the ascension of Octavian, later to he replaced by the Dominate in 284 BCE with the ascension of Diocletian(though that distinction is disputed), together forming the Empire as a system dominated by the reigns of Emperors, ended as you describe by the deposition of Romulus Augustus in 476 CE and the conquest of Constantinople in 1453 CE.