this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
138 points (96.6% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !roughromanmemes@piefed.social

944 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !roughromanmemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would argue that the Empire as an imperialist hegemon started with their conquests that formed a hegemony, which I'd place around 340 BCE. The Principate replaced the Republic in 27 BCE with the ascension of Octavian, later to he replaced by the Dominate in 284 BCE with the ascension of Diocletian(though that distinction is disputed), together forming the Empire as a system dominated by the reigns of Emperors, ended as you describe by the deposition of Romulus Augustus in 476 CE and the conquest of Constantinople in 1453 CE.

[โ€“] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 10 months ago

External policy-wise I agree with you. I was focusing mostly on the internal power structure.