kieron115

joined 1 year ago
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

this here is the real issue.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The update was meant to fix a situation where an attacker would somehow get grub onto a machine that was SINGLE booting windows and use grub to tamper with secureboot. this fix was meant to only apply in single boot situations where it should be entirely unexpected to see grub. as they said, something went seriously wrong.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago

It seems to me that the real reason people are upset is that they don't want to accept that the devs of games they like willingly accepted the money. As if Epic forced them.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I can't think of any time in history that the public has had that ability for anything. Imagine being upset because a Ford dealership won't sell you a Toyota, or that Kohl's won't sell you some designer brand.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It's DRM free. Pirate it and add an external game to Steam if the other options are unappealing to you.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

I think it would be easier for me to empathize with the "exclusivity" argument if it weren't for the fact that PCs as a general rule are inherently open. I don't have to buy a new computer to install a new games launcher as I would with a console exclusives war. Hell most of the time you don't even have to install the official launcher as so many of them are just web wrappers/electron apps. I've been using the Heroic Games Launcher to claim my free Epic games for nearly a year and the only "downside", if you can even call it that, is that I don't get the weekly popup's letting me know what's free/on sale. Just building a huge library of free games, some of which I already own on Steam. Somebody please show me the actual downside of more competition on a single platform.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It wasn't pulled from Steam. A development company consisting of three people that put out a popular mobile game 15+ years ago got an opportunity they wouldn't otherwise have had to create a sequel and took it. They published on (shockedpikachuface) their publishers platform, as well as Nintendo consoles and their own website for people who don't like Epic. I doubt Allan, Kyle and Kyle would have had the funds or skill to do this on their own.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website -4 points 11 months ago (20 children)

The epic hate is tiresome. It sounds like they functioned as a publisher here, providing long term funding of development prior to release. The game isn't exclusive and has no DRM, I see no downside to this. Stop hopping on bandwagons of hate and enjoy your games people.

view more: ‹ prev next ›