haroldstork

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago

The four guys in question:

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Hell yeah!!!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Watched it, was very good

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Loud music!!!!!!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

This is just flat out false.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Functionally equivalent, the compiler will optimize lots for you. As the programmer, your focus should be on whether that variable is relevant to the loop's scope exclusively or not (i.e. if you need to access the variable after the loop has modified it). If not, keep it in the loop so that its easier to read your code.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Thank you! Is fennec the goto now?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

Fantastic video

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

"Its shocking that slang shortens words a lot" Pop culture being idiotic isn't new. It's idiotic to generalize an entire generation based off of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

One of the biggest misconceptions of imaginary numbers is that "i = √-1" Well... it does equal that, but the bigger truth is that "i^2 = -1". We don't care what the actual value of i is, we're imagining a number who's square is -1 and all the awesome math that comes from that is the complex numbers.

 
28
RAHHHH (files.catbox.moe)
14
gitposting (files.catbox.moe)
 
287
uraniumposting (files.catbox.moe)
 
284
mathposting (files.catbox.moe)
 
43
what? (files.catbox.moe)
 
327
violenceposting (files.catbox.moe)
 
455
seriousposting (files.catbox.moe)
 
88
lagomorph (files.catbox.moe)
 
140
luigiposting (files.catbox.moe)
 
133
the one (files.catbox.moe)
 
274
hockey (files.catbox.moe)
 
view more: next ›