Why would either need to side with Russia? They only have 140m people, a untrustworthy and soon to be unstable government. If you're aim is to carve up territory then you don't give a potential long term adversary access to half a billion people.
hairyfeet
joined 2 years ago
Chicken's dozen
It's certainly going well for the Americans. Or, we could just TAX THE RICH.
(Agree the govt shouldn't be punching down yet again.)
Inflicting 1m casualties, destroying half the Russian oil production, backing from the majority of European nations, etc...
"No cards" Absolute buffoon
Move fast, break things, leave the front door unlocked, salute the führer
Any kind of residential area with a long straight road...
If they want to prevent another war five years after this one has finished, they're going to have to commit boots on the ground.
Finally get the Futurama reference now👍
In historic record, Ukrainian F-16 pilot downs 6 cruise missiles in single mission, Air Force claims
What weapons do they use to shoot them down? Guns? Missiles?
PC/steam deck
view more: next ›
Do you toast them on both sides? My toaster has a crumpet option that only toasts one side, which was news to me