eskimofry

Your definition of abuse and neglect is not universal. let each parent decide.

better follow a trend than crash and burn trying to change things up. I think we all have had enough trilogies ruined by the 3rd film.

hey the definition of criminal is set by fallible people so don't pretend it's the be all end all!

"criminal" is such an encompassing term that seems to put murderers, rapists, drug peddlers who sell to children vs. some weed smokers, falsely accused people, white collar criminals, petty criminals including shoplifters, jaywalkers, etc.

You can't seriously think someone who steals an apple from a shop needs the same treatment as a violent unrepentant murderer?

ignoring evidence is apparently adulthood now

you can't find anything recent?

hey you seem to have this boner for punishing people instead of helping them. Most parents want the best for their children. their lack of means is not something we should punish the children for.

we can spot from space, the africa sized hole in your shitty counter argument

So we counter extreme bahvior with more extreme behavior? That's the world you want to live in?

Violence is not to be repaid in kind if rich people inflict it with the help of the government?

You’re naive if you think any kind of reasonable change can happen without bloodshed. The peace and stability you have grown up with and come to love was gotten with a lot of bloodshed.

That’s the world that’s created for us. That seems to be the only kind of action that’s moving the needle. Working within the system is an idea sold to chumps so they obstruct real change.

Putting a bullet into a bastard scares the rest of them so they at least slow down in their unquenchable lust for power and money.

You’re gonna roll eyes on the answer or already know what needs to be done. We need to change the system so people are less inclined to shoplift.

The theory makes you understend why a method works for a certain problem. A lot of exams try to trick the taker by giving problems that are almost solvable with just the toolbox but need a bit extra trick to solve which theory can help. But there again i find that simply knowing the specific trick is enough to do well.

But personally believing that is in any way important to succeed in exams has lead me to waste too much time. If you find that you have prepared well enough to solve any problems across math for an exam, it would then be ok to then cover the theory.

So in essence, just keep doing what you're doing.

Fuck what baby boomers think. Bunch of greedy and selfish cunts.

Maybe stop being entitled to exponential profits and come back down to earth. These shitheads don't think for a second how increasing prices, and fragmentation can only ruins peoples' tolerance of corporate propaganda they hawk on the daily.