Your belief is wrong. That is not what a penetration test does. They are looking at it from the outside.
emergencycall
joined 3 years ago
A penetration test is not an audit and does not provide any such assurance that logs are not retained. The goal of a penetration test is to penetrate via vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, not validate public logging claims about a service
how people who are both blind and deaf communicate
They say this shit all the time and never follow through. It's not newsworthy. It is disinformation
It would help more people to improve the installer for difficult-to-install software rather than creating an entire operating system around that software. Using the entire operating system as an installer is over the top
Count the number of states where "others" were not on the ballot: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries#Ballot_access
The new language seems equivalent to the old language.
Exactly. Mozilla doesn't "operate" Firefox. Firefox is a binary application on my computer. I operate Firefox. They develop Firefox. Huge difference
The new language seems equivalent to the old language.
The new language seems equivalent to the old language.
Currently playing Stardew Valley
view more: next ›
You need better logging. Try doing a packet capture with tcpdump then decrypt the HTTPS traffic. Because what you've described so far, especially before the edit makes no sense.
If you don't have a DNS record pointing the subdomain to the IP address of the server, it shouldn't be possible to resolve the IP for random Internet users. If this VHOST only exists in your Apache config file and nowhere else, it is private.