e0qdk
Nice! Glad I could help!
Should be on your install media. If I mount linuxmint-22.1-cinnamon-64bit.iso on my computer right now, I see:
EFI/boot/bootia32.efi
EFI/boot/bootx64.efi
EFI/boot/grubx64.efi
Sorry to link to reddit, but have you already tried the suggestions in this thread from a year ago: https://old.reddit.com/r/pop_os/comments/16tf1vl/something_has_gone_seriously_wrong_import_mok/ ?
Large (1920x9750, ~3MB) screenshot for posterity + those who absolutely do not want to access reddit at all: https://files.catbox.moe/mqsdxh.png
Edit: (Related links)
- https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/ooooy-efi-boot-mmx64-efi-efi-not-found-4175644607/
- https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=308137
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/565615/efi-boot-bootx64-efi-vs-efi-ubuntu-grubx64-efi-vs-boot-grub-x86-64-efi-gru/571173#571173
I'd try the "copy \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi
to EFI\BOOT\mmx64.efi
" solution personally and see what happens. If that works, you might just have an obnoxious BIOS on that computer.
I wouldn't personally object to the community becoming "visual novels (and other IF)", especially while posting volume is low.
I've tried setting up projects that used hard links like that and there are some pros and cons to this. On the plus side, you can delete from one location and the file is still available in the other without having to manage a separate repository structure. On the down side, most software cannot copy the structure correctly to a different file system (even one that supports hard links), which can make backups and migrations annoying to deal with -- generally you end up with multiple actual copies, ballooning disk space usage and sometimes causing weird issues if the two files linking to the same data (rather than just having copies of the same data) actually matters...
I'd recommend sticking with the "primary repository of real files" and "multiple views filled with symlinks" structure over hardlinks unless you're really sure you know what you're getting yourself into.
Try running ffmpeg -i input.m4a -acodec copy output.mp4
to just copy the audio track (in the same codec) with no video at all and see if that works.
You can do this using links. e.g. ln -s TARGET LINK_NAME
to make symbolic links on the command line, or (usually) by holding some key while dragging a file/folder between windows in your preferred GUI file manager.
I have something related set up with a small Python script to automatically create new files and update the links for tracking my weekly work notes (pseudo-timecard, basically).
I know a graphics designer personally (from work) who used an AI generated video clip as part of a proposed background video for the landing page of a marketing-style website that was getting a refresh on one of our projects. That one ultimately didn't end up getting used -- not because it looked bad, but because of other branding considerations. Frankly, I'm glad that he didn't have to put much effort into making something that ended up getting canned.
There's a LOT of art out there that's functional. Few people stop and pay attention to it as art in itself -- and it rarely lasts more than a few years before getting swapped out for something else in rebranding -- but someone with design sense still needs to make it or a product will be less appealing.
Right now I mostly use KolourPaint, GIMP, and occasionally some of my own software. This one was all KolourPaint.
I've hand written SVG a couple times, but not for anything I've posted on Lemmy as far as I can recall.